08 Nov 2021
08 Nov 2021
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

The Sensitivity of the Fitch Wind Farm Parameterization to a Three-Dimensional Planetary Boundary Layer Scheme

Alex Rybchuk1,2, Timothy W. Juliano3, Julie K. Lundquist2,4, David Rosencrans2,4, Nicola Bodini2, and Mike Optis2 Alex Rybchuk et al.
  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA
  • 2National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, USA
  • 3Research Applications Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA
  • 4Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Abstract. Wind plant wake impacts can be estimated with a number of simulation methodologies, each with its own fidelity and sensitivity to model inputs. In turbine-free mesoscale simulations, hub-height wind speeds can significantly vary with the choice of a planetary boundary layer (PBL) scheme. However, the sensitivity of wind plant wakes to a PBL scheme has not been explored because, until now, wake parameterizations were only compatible with one PBL scheme. We couple the Fitch wind farm parameterization with the new NCAR 3DPBL scheme and compare the resulting wakes to those simulated with a widely used PBL scheme. First, we simulate a wind plant in a pseudo-steady state under idealized stable, neutral, and unstable conditions with two PBL schemes: MYNN and the NCAR 3DPBL. For these idealized scenarios, MYNN consistently predicts internal wakes that are 0.25–1.5 m s−1 stronger than internal 3DPBL wakes. However, because MYNN predicts stronger inflow winds than the 3DPBL, MYNN predicts average capacity factors that are as large as 13 percentage points higher than with the 3DPBL, depending on the stability. To extend this sensitivity study, we conduct a month-long case study with both PBL schemes centered on the Vineyard Wind 1 lease area in the mid-Atlantic United States. Under stable and unstable conditions averaged across the month, MYNN again predicts stronger internal waking—by about 0.25 m s−1. However, again due to stronger plant inflow wind speeds in MYNN, the 3DPBL generates 4.7 %–7.8 % less power than MYNN in August 2020, depending on the turbine build-out scenario. Differences between PBL schemes can be even larger for individual instances in time. These simulations suggest that PBL schemes represent a meaningful source of modeled wind resource uncertainty; therefore, we recommend incorporating PBL variability into future wind plant planning sensitivity studies as well as wind forecasting studies.

Alex Rybchuk et al.

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on wes-2021-127', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Dec 2021
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alex Rybchuk, 03 Mar 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on wes-2021-127', Anonymous Referee #2, 16 Jan 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Alex Rybchuk, 03 Mar 2022

Alex Rybchuk et al.

Alex Rybchuk et al.


Total article views: 592 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
404 178 10 592 6 5
  • HTML: 404
  • PDF: 178
  • XML: 10
  • Total: 592
  • BibTeX: 6
  • EndNote: 5
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Nov 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Nov 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 587 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 587 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
Latest update: 16 May 2022
Short summary
Numerical weather prediction models are used to predict how wind turbines will interact with the atmosphere. Here, we characterize the uncertainty associated with the choice of turbulence parameterization on modeled wakes. We find that simulated wind speed deficits in turbine wakes can be significantly sensitive to the choice of turbulence parameterization. As such, predictions of future generated power are also sensitive to turbulence parameterization choice.