Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2021-51
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2021-51

  01 Jun 2021

01 Jun 2021

Review status: a revised version of this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

On Turbulence Models and LiDAR Measurements for Wind Turbine Control

Liang Dong1, Wai Hou Lio1, and Eric Simley2 Liang Dong et al.
  • 1Department of Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark
  • 2National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, Colorado 80401, USA

Abstract. To provide comprehensive information that will assist in making decisions regarding the adoption of LiDAR assisted control (LAC) in wind turbine design, this paper investigates the impact of different turbulence models on the coherence between the rotor effective wind speed and LiDAR measurement. First, the differences between the Kaimal and Mann models are discussed, including the power spectrum and spatial coherence. Next, two types of LiDAR systems are examined to analyze the LiDAR measurement coherence based on commercially available LiDAR scan patterns. Finally, numerical simulations have been performed to compare the LiDAR measurement coherence for different rotor sizes. This work confirms the association between the measurement coherence and the turbulence model. The results indicate that the LiDAR measurement coherence with the Mann turbulence model is lower than that with the Kaimal turbulence model. In other words, the value creation of LAC, evaluated using the Kaimal turbulence model, will be diminished if the Mann turbulence model is used instead. In particular, the difference in coherence is more significant for larger rotors. As a result, this paper suggests that the impacts of different turbulence models should be considered as uncertainties while evaluating the benefits of LAC.

Liang Dong et al.

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Referee comment on wes-2021-51', Anonymous Referee #1, 26 Jun 2021
  • RC2: 'Comment on wes-2021-51', Anonymous Referee #2, 27 Jun 2021
  • AC1: 'Comment on wes-2021-51', Liang Dong, 15 Jul 2021

Liang Dong et al.

Liang Dong et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 431 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
312 110 9 431 5 3
  • HTML: 312
  • PDF: 110
  • XML: 9
  • Total: 431
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jun 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jun 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 427 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 427 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 23 Sep 2021
Download
Short summary
This paper suggests that the impacts of different turbulence models should be considered as uncertainties while evaluating the benefits of LiDAR assisted control (LAC) in wind turbine design. The value creation of LAC, evaluated using the Kaimal turbulence model, will be diminished if the Mann turbulence model is used instead. In particular, the difference in coherence is more significant for larger rotors.