06 Sep 2023
 | 06 Sep 2023
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

A Code-to-Code Comparison for Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Simulation in Realistic Environmental Conditions: Quantifying the Impact of Modeling Fidelity on Different Substructure Concepts

Francesco Papi, Giancarlo Troise, Robert Behrens de Luna, Joseph Saverin, Sebastian Perez-Becker, David Marten, Marie-Laure Ducasse, and Alessandro Bianchini

Abstract. Consensus is arising on considering floating offshore wind as the most promising technologies to increase renewable energy generation offshore. While evolving fast from a technological point of view, Floating Offshore Wind Turbines (FOWTs) are challenging, as their performance and loads are governed by complex dynamics that are a result of the coupled influence of wind, waves, and currents on the structures. Many open challenges are therefore still in place, especially from a modeling perspective. This study contributes to the understanding of the impact of modeling differences on FOWT loads by comparing three FOWT simulation codes, QBlade-Ocean, OpenFAST, and DeepLines Wind® and three substructure designs, a semi-submersible, a spar-buoy, and the two-part concept Hexafloat in realistic environmental conditions. This extensive comparison represents one of the main outcomes of the H2020 project FLOATECH. In accordance with international standards for FOWT certification, multiple design situations are compared, including operation in normal power production and parked conditions. Results show that the compared codes agree well in the prediction of the system dynamics, regardless of the fidelity of the underlying modeling theories. Some differences between the codes emerged however in the analysis of fatigue loads, where, contrary to extreme loads, specific trends can be noted. With respect to QBlade-Ocean, OpenFAST was found to overestimate lifetime damage equivalent loads up to 14 %. DeepLines Wind®, on the other hand, underestimated lifetime fatigue loads by up to 13.5 %. Regardless of the model and FOWT design however, differences in fatigue loads are larger for tower base loads than for blade root loads, due to the larger influence substructure dynamics have on these loads.

Francesco Papi et al.

Status: open (until 16 Oct 2023)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse

Francesco Papi et al.

Francesco Papi et al.


Total article views: 300 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
164 131 5 300 3 3
  • HTML: 164
  • PDF: 131
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 300
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Sep 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Sep 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 298 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 298 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
Latest update: 22 Sep 2023
Short summary
Wind turbines are simulated for thousands of hours to estimate structural design loads. Mid-fidelity numerical models are used for this task, to strike a balance between computational cost and accuracy. The considerable displacements of floating wind turbines may be a challenge for some of these models. This paper enhances comprehension of how modeling theories affect floating wind turbine simulations. It does so by assessing three codes across three turbines simulated in the real environment.