Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-127
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-127
06 Dec 2023
 | 06 Dec 2023
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

Understanding the impact of data gaps on long-term offshore wind resource estimates

Martin Georg Jonietz Alvarez, Warren Watson, and Julia Gottschall

Abstract. In the context of a wind farm project, the wind resource is assessed to predict the power output and the optimal positioning of the wind turbines. That requires taking wind measurements on the site of interest and extrapolating these to the long-term using so-called "measure, correlate, and predict" (MCP) methods. The failure of sensors, power supply, or software are common phenomena. These disruptions cause gaps in the measured data, which can be especially long in offshore measurement campaigns due to harsh weather conditions causing system failures and preventing servicing and redeployment. The present study investigates the effect of measurement data gaps on long-term offshore wind estimates by analyzing the bias they introduce in the parameters commonly used for wind resource assessment. Furthermore, it aims to show how filling the gaps can mitigate their effect. To achieve this, we perform the investigations for three offshore sites in Europe with 2 years of concurrent measurements. We use reanalysis data and various MCP methods to fill gaps in the measured data and extrapolate this data to the long term. The results of the investigations show that the effects of gaps on long-term extrapolations are lower than expected. For instance, gaps of 180 days cause an average deviation of the long-term mean wind speed of less than 0.04 ms-1 for all tested sites. Filling the gaps can slightly reduce their impact if the MCP method used for gap filling performs better for predicting known data than the MCP method used for long-term extrapolating.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Martin Georg Jonietz Alvarez, Warren Watson, and Julia Gottschall

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-127', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Jan 2024
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Martin Jonietz Alvarez, 01 Feb 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on wes-2023-127', Anonymous Referee #2, 08 Feb 2024
Martin Georg Jonietz Alvarez, Warren Watson, and Julia Gottschall
Martin Georg Jonietz Alvarez, Warren Watson, and Julia Gottschall

Viewed

Total article views: 476 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
344 113 19 476 17 16
  • HTML: 344
  • PDF: 113
  • XML: 19
  • Total: 476
  • BibTeX: 17
  • EndNote: 16
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Dec 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Dec 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 465 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 465 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 23 May 2024
Download
Short summary
Offshore wind measurements are often affected by gaps. We investigated how these gaps affect wind resource assessments and whether filling them reduces their effect. We find that the gap effect on the estimated long-term wind resource is lower than expected and that data gap filling does not significantly change the outcome. These results indicate a need to reduce current wind data availability requirements for offshore measurement campaigns.
Altmetrics