the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Assessing the impact of waves and platform dynamics on floating wind turbine energy production
Abstract. Waves have the potential to increase the power output of a floating wind turbine forcing the rotor to move against wind. Starting from this observation, we use four multi-physics models of increasing complexity to investigate the role of waves and platform movements in the energy conversion process of four floating wind turbines of 5–15 MW in the Mediterranean Sea. The current technology of spar and semi-submersible floating wind turbines is not suitable to exploit the energy of waves because their design philosophy aims to minimize motions and structural loads, whereas large along-wind rotor movements are needed to increase the power output. Instead, in a realistic met-ocean environment, the power curve of the floating wind turbines we analyzed is lower than with a fixed foundation, with AEP reductions of 1.5–2.5 %. The lower energy production is mainly ascribed to the platform static tilt, which reduces the rotor area projection on the vertical plane, and to floating-specific features of the turbine controller, that are thought to mitigate structural loading sacrificing performance.
- Preprint
(3127 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
- RC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-137', Anonymous Referee #1, 27 Nov 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on wes-2023-137', Rad Haghi, 20 Dec 2023
The paper addresses the impact of the Floating Offshore Wind Turbine (FOWT) motions on wind turbine power generation. It examines whether the energy from the wave can be converted into the power produced by the wind turbine using platform motion. The conclusion drawn from the study is that this is not feasible with the current design practices.
- The paper structure needs to be improved. It is hard to follow the paper as it has long paragraphs. Using bullet points and tables can improve the manuscript.
- In the introduction section, the main contribution, the authors mentioned sensitivity analysis, but it is not clear in the manuscript as it is distributed in the results section. I think it is better to have its section in the results.
- The methodology section starts with extracting equations 3 and 4, but it is not clear how they contribute to the manuscript. Also, it is unclear how they contributed to the results, as all the results seem to be based on OpenFAST simulations.
- The results section is confusing and needs restructuring. Also, more wind-wave misalignment cases can strengthen the manuscript for the Coupled-S case, as Figure 14 only presents two wind-wave misalignments.
Please find my more detailed comments in the attached annotated manuscript PDF file.
-
AC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-137', Alessandro Fontanella, 16 Jan 2024
Dear Referees,
We would like to thank you for having reviewed our manuscript and for the valuable feedback. Your suggestions focused our attention on aspects we didn’t consider in the first version of the article, and we believe this will improve the quality and impact of this work.
We tried to improve article following your suggestions and we hope to have addressed most of your concerns, otherwise we would be happy to continue the discussion.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-137-AC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
289 | 141 | 11 | 441 | 15 | 9 |
- HTML: 289
- PDF: 141
- XML: 11
- Total: 441
- BibTeX: 15
- EndNote: 9
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1