Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-150
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-150
08 Nov 2023
 | 08 Nov 2023
Status: a revised version of this preprint was accepted for the journal WES and is expected to appear here in due course.

Improvements to the Dynamic Wake Meandering Model by incorporating the turbulent Schmidt number

Peter Brugger, Corey Markfort, and Fernando Porté-Agel

Abstract. Predictions of the dynamic wake meandering model (DWMM) were compared to flow measurements of a scanning Doppler lidar mounted on the nacelle of a utility-scale wind turbine. We observed that the wake meandering strength of the DWMM agrees better with the observation, if the incoming mean wind speed is used as advection velocity for the downstream transport, while a better temporal agreement is achieved with an advection velocity slower than the incoming mean wind speed. A subsequent investigation of the lateral wake transport revealed differences to the passive tracer assumption of the DWMM in addition to a non-passive downstream transport reported in earlier studies. We propose to include the turbulent Schmidt number in the DWMM to improve (i) the consistency of the model physics and (ii) the prediction quality. Compared to a benchmark, the thus modified DWMM showed a root-mean-square error reduction by 5 % for mean velocity deficit and 7 % for the turbulence intensity, relative to the unmodified DWMM, in addition to better temporal agreement of the dynamics. This is in contrast to an error increase of 64 % and 41 % if only a more accurate downstream transport velocity is used without including the turbulent Schmidt number.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Peter Brugger, Corey Markfort, and Fernando Porté-Agel

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-150', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Dec 2023
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Peter Brugger, 13 Mar 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on wes-2023-150', Anonymous Referee #2, 11 Feb 2024
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Peter Brugger, 13 Mar 2024

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-150', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Dec 2023
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Peter Brugger, 13 Mar 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on wes-2023-150', Anonymous Referee #2, 11 Feb 2024
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Peter Brugger, 13 Mar 2024
Peter Brugger, Corey Markfort, and Fernando Porté-Agel
Peter Brugger, Corey Markfort, and Fernando Porté-Agel

Viewed

Total article views: 422 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
292 107 23 422 14 9
  • HTML: 292
  • PDF: 107
  • XML: 23
  • Total: 422
  • BibTeX: 14
  • EndNote: 9
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Nov 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Nov 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 411 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 411 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 23 May 2024
Download
Short summary
The dynamic wake meandering model (DWMM) assumes that wind turbine wakes are transported like a passive tracer by the large-scale turbulence of the atmospheric boundary layer. We show that both the streamwise transport and the lateral transport have differences to the passive tracer assumption. We then propose to include the turbulent Schmidt number into the DWMM to address the observed differences and show that it improves the quality of the model predictions.
Altmetrics