05 Feb 2024
 | 05 Feb 2024
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

Characterization of Local Wind Profiles: A Random Forest Approach for Enhanced Wind Profile Extrapolation

Farkhondeh Rouholahnejad and Julia Gottschall

Abstract. Accurate wind speed determination at the height of the rotor swept area is critical for resource assessments. ERA5 data combined with short-term measurements through the "Measure, Correlate, Predict" (MCP) method is commonly used for offshore applications in this context. However, ERA5 poses limitations in capturing site-specific wind speed variability due to its low resolution. To address this, we developed random forest models extending near-surface wind speed up to 200 m, focusing on the Dutch part of the North Sea. Our results show that the random forest model trained on site-specific wind profiles outperforms the MCP-corrected ERA5 wind profiles in accuracy, bias, and correlation. In absence of rotor-height measurements, a model trained within a 200 km region handles vertical extension effectively, albeit with increased bias. Our regionally trained random forest model exhibits superior accuracy in capturing wind speed variations and local effects, with an average deviation below 5 % compared to corrected ERA5 with a 20 % deviation from measurements. The random forest model adeptly captures the inertial subrange of the power spectrum where ERA5 shows degradation. Our study highlights the potential enhancement in wind resource assessment by means of machine learning methods, specifically random forest. Future research may explore extending the random forest methodology for higher heights, benefiting new generation of offshore wind turbines, and investigating cluster wakes in the North Sea through a multinational network of floating lidars, contingent on data availability.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Farkhondeh Rouholahnejad and Julia Gottschall

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-178', Anonymous Referee #1, 26 Feb 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on wes-2023-178', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Mar 2024
Farkhondeh Rouholahnejad and Julia Gottschall
Farkhondeh Rouholahnejad and Julia Gottschall


Total article views: 473 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
380 81 12 473 14 8
  • HTML: 380
  • PDF: 81
  • XML: 12
  • Total: 473
  • BibTeX: 14
  • EndNote: 8
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Feb 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Feb 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 460 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 460 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
Latest update: 23 May 2024
Short summary
In wind energy, precise wind speed prediction at hub-height is vital. Our study in the Dutch North Sea reveals that the on-site trained random forest model outperforms the global reanalysis data, ERA5, in accuracy and precision. Trained within a 200 km range, the model effectively extends the wind speed vertically but experiences bias. It also outperforms corrected ERA5 in capturing wind speed variations and fine wind patterns, highlighting its potential for offshore wind resource assessment.