the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The wind farm pressure field
Ronald Smith
Abstract. The disturbed atmospheric pressure near a wind farm arises from the turbine drag forces in combination with vertical confinement associated with atmospheric stability. These pressure gradients slow the wind upstream, deflect the air laterally, weaken the flow deceleration over the farm and modify the wake recovery. Here, we describe the airflow and pressure disturbance near a wind farm under typical stability conditions and alternatively, with the simplifying assumption of a rigid lid. The rigid lid case clarifies the cause of the pressure disturbance and its close relationship to wind farm drag.
The key to understanding the rigid lid model is the proof that the pressure field p(x,y) is a Harmonic Function almost everywhere. It follows that the maximum and minimum pressure occur at the front and back edge of the farm. Over the farm, the favorable pressure gradient is constant and significantly offsets the turbine drag. Upwind and downwind of the farm, the pressure field is a dipole given by p(x,y)≈Axr−2 where the coefficient A is proportional to the total farm drag. Two derivations of this law are given. Field measurements of pressure can be used to find the coefficient A and thus to estimate total farm drag.
- Preprint
(968 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Ronald Smith
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-56', Dries Allaerts, 19 Jun 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://wes.copernicus.org/preprints/wes-2023-56/wes-2023-56-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Ronald Smith, 23 Jun 2023
Thanks for reading the paper so closely and for these useful comments. I will try to address your comments in the revisions.
In your Major Comment #2, you indicated that there might papers in the literature that use a rigid lid assumption. I have not found these papers, but I would like to. Do you know of one?
In your Major Comment #5, you mentioned upstream decay rates and farm aspect ratio. I played around with this issue but barely mentioned it in the paper. It was getting too long. The aspect ratio influences the near field, but not the far field. The distant pressure field depends only on the total farm drag (in the RL case).
Ron Smith
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-56-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Ronald Smith, 23 Jun 2023
- RC2: 'Comment on wes-2023-56', Bleeg James, 26 Jul 2023
-
AC2: 'Comment on wes-2023-56', Ronald Smith, 07 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://wes.copernicus.org/preprints/wes-2023-56/wes-2023-56-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC3: 'Comment on wes-2023-56', Ronald Smith, 07 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://wes.copernicus.org/preprints/wes-2023-56/wes-2023-56-AC3-supplement.pdf
Ronald Smith
Ronald Smith
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
490 | 105 | 18 | 613 | 7 | 5 |
- HTML: 490
- PDF: 105
- XML: 18
- Total: 613
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1