the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Free-vortex models for wind turbine wakes under yaw misalignment – a validation study on far-wake effects
Maarten J. van den Broek
Delphine De Tavernier
Paul Hulsman
Daan van der Hoek
Benjamin Sanderse
Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Abstract. Near-wake effects of wind turbine models using the free-vortex wake have been extensively studied, but there is a lack of validation for such predictions in the mid to far wake. This paper presents a novel validation study using three free-vortex wake models of increasing complexity: an actuator disc, an actuator disc with rotation, and an actuator-line model. We emphasise the application for dynamic wind farm flow control optimisation with a focus on wake redirection using yaw misalignment. For that purpose, surrogate wake models should provide sufficiently accurate power predictions at low computational expense. Three sets of wind tunnel data are used for validation: flow measurements under steady yaw misalignment, time-resolved flow measurements for a step change in yaw, and turbine output measurements with yaw control and simulated wind direction variation. Results indicate that the actuator-disc model provides the best balance of computational cost and accuracy in power predictions for the mid to far wake, which is not significantly improved upon by the addition of rotation. In the near wake, the added complexity of the actuator-line model may provide value as it models blade loading and individual tip vortices. Altogether, this study conclusively demonstrates that the actuator-disc model is suitable for yaw control optimisation and provides important validation for further studies into optimisation of wake steering under time-varying conditions.
- Preprint
(5535 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Maarten J. van den Broek et al.
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-57', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Jul 2023
The paper provides an extensive analysis of the use of the free-vortex model for wind turbines in yaw using the actuator disk, actuator disk with rotation, and actuator line formulations. The results demonstrate that these models perform well at reconstructing the flow and are theoretically sound. The paper is generally clear and well written. However, some improvements to the paper could improve its usefulness to readers.
My only significant critique is that it is difficult to follow the equations to compare to other theoretical formulations and papers. More details about the coordinate systems and careful definitions of variables would go a long way in helping readers replicate the results. The yawed wind turbine literature is filled with imprecisely defined variables like induction factor that are not consistent across papers. This makes it very hard to replicate studies and results and has resulted in citation errors. A careful writing would prevent this paper from having that flaw.
I also suggest that more details about the computational cost would help readers understand the best application of this approach. Comparisons to LES and engineering models, for example, could help users weight the costs and benefits. Scaling with number of turbines, domain size, and resolution would also be helpful.
Some more specific comments are below:
Section 2.2.1: Could you elaborate on the use of the induction factor. Is a measured as streamwise induction or induction normal to the rotor? For ADM-R and ALM, how does a vary with radius?
Section 2.2.2: A few comments on this section:
- The ADM vortex system should be a semi-infinite cylinder. How does the streamwise and azimuthal discretization relate the the streamwise velocity? Does this include induction? Please relate Δt to the streamwise velocity.
- In what direction is the vorticity pointing? Is it purely azimuthal vorticity? A yawed wind turbine should also generate streamwise vorticity, which can be predicted analysitically. Does your equation provide this vorticity?Sections 2.2.3 and 2.2.4: I have similar questions in these sections to Section 2.2.2. It is unclear exactly what the coordinate system is, in which direction the vorticity is pointing, and how the system is discretized relative to the streamwise velocity.
Figure 2: How is vortex filament spacing normalized? Is it by delta t? Please put on the axis label. Is the velocity error dimensionless? Equation 18 would have units of velocity. Please note the units in the ordinate label.
Section 3: A few comments on Section 3:
- You could also compare the results to theory since the flow behind an unyawed turbine is well known.
- Please also report results for yawed wind turbines. The unyawed case is much more difficult to reconstruct and errors in the modeling of yaw would not be apparent without this comparison.
- Were these results all using the steady state experiments from Section 4?
- Can you provide an estimate of the computational cost with this scaling and how it compares to other methods (e.g. LES or engineering models).Section 4.1: Some more repetition of the basics of these experiments here would be useful so the reader does not have to go back to these other papers.
Section 4.1.1 and 4.1.2: Paragraphs typically need 3-4 sentences. I suggest you remove the line breaks and make these entire sections into one paragraph.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-57-RC1 - RC2: 'Comment on wes-2023-57', Anonymous Referee #2, 19 Jul 2023
- AC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-57', Maarten van den Broek, 22 Aug 2023
Maarten J. van den Broek et al.
Data sets
Data underlying the publication: Free-vortex models for wind turbine wakes under yaw misalignment - a validation study on far-wake effects Daan van der Hoek, Maarten J. van den Broek, Jan-WIllem van Wingerden https://doi.org/10.4121/70ae7f4c-f87f-45f1-8360-f4958a60249f.v1
Data Supplement for ’Curled Wake Development of a Yawed Wind Turbine at Turbulent and Sheared Inflow’ - Wind Energy Science Journal Paul Hulsman, Martin Wosbik, Vlaho Petrovic, Michaul Hölling, Martin Kühn https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5734877
Model code and software
Simulation data and code underlying the publication: Free-vortex models for wind turbine wakes under yaw misalign- ment – a validation study on far-wake effects Maarten J. van den Broek https://doi.org/10.4121/e32a9868-c5ea-43d3-8969-b1908662b2b2
Maarten J. van den Broek et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
481 | 88 | 14 | 583 | 7 | 6 |
- HTML: 481
- PDF: 88
- XML: 14
- Total: 583
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1