Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-80
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-80
08 Aug 2023
 | 08 Aug 2023
Status: a revised version of this preprint was accepted for the journal WES.

Uncertainty quantification of structural blade parameters for the aeroelastic damping of wind turbines: a code-to-code comparison

Hendrik Verdonck, Oliver Hach, Jelmer D. Polman, Otto Braun, Claudio Balzani, Sarah Müller, and Johannes Rieke

Abstract. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a well-established category of methods to estimate the effect of parameter variations on a quantity of interest, based on a solid mathematical fundament. In the wind energy field most UQ studies were focused on the sensitivity of turbine loads. This article presents a framework, wrapped around a modern Python UQ library, to analyze the impact of uncertain turbine properties on aeroelastic stability. The UQ methodology applies a polynomial chaos expansion surrogate model to increase the numerical efficiency. A comparison is made between different wind turbine simulation tools on the engineering model level (alaska/Wind, Bladed, HAWC2/HAWCStab2 and Simpack). Two case studies are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the method to analyze the sensitivity of the aeroelastic damping of an unstable turbine mode to variations of structural blade cross section parameters. The code-to-code comparison shows a good agreement between the simulation tools for the reference model, but also significant differences in the sensitivities.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Hendrik Verdonck, Oliver Hach, Jelmer D. Polman, Otto Braun, Claudio Balzani, Sarah Müller, and Johannes Rieke

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-80', Leonardo Bergami, 31 Aug 2023
    • AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Hendrik Verdonck, 01 Sep 2023
  • RC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-80', Ozan Gozcu, 15 Sep 2023
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Hendrik Verdonck, 29 Sep 2023
  • RC2: 'Comment on wes-2023-80', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Oct 2023
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Hendrik Verdonck, 17 Oct 2023
Hendrik Verdonck, Oliver Hach, Jelmer D. Polman, Otto Braun, Claudio Balzani, Sarah Müller, and Johannes Rieke
Hendrik Verdonck, Oliver Hach, Jelmer D. Polman, Otto Braun, Claudio Balzani, Sarah Müller, and Johannes Rieke

Viewed

Total article views: 918 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
646 238 34 918 23 23
  • HTML: 646
  • PDF: 238
  • XML: 34
  • Total: 918
  • BibTeX: 23
  • EndNote: 23
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Aug 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Aug 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 899 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 899 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 14 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
Aeroelastic stability simulations are needed to guarantee the safety and overall robust design of wind turbines. To increase our confidence in these simulations in the future, the sensitivity of the stability analysis with respect to variability in the structural properties of the wind turbine blades is investigated. Multiple state-of-the-art tools are compared and the study shows that even though the tools predict similar stability behavior, the sensitivity might be significantly different.
Altmetrics