the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Wear test programs for roller-type pitch bearings of wind turbines
Matthias Stammler
Abstract. Pitch bearings are critical for the safe and efficient operation of wind turbines. They connect the rotor blades to the rotor hub and allow for pitching movements that control loads and rotor speeds. While four-point contact ball bearings have been dominant in the past, three-row roller bearings are increasingly used in current designs due to their higher load capacity at the same diameter. Wear of the raceways is one of the possible damage mechanisms in pitch bearings. As roller bearings differ significantly from previous designs and because the operational conditions of wind turbines differ from other industrial applications, it is a reasonable de-risking exercise to undergo wear tests prior to the commissioning of such bearings. This study outlines a process for developing a wear test program based on aero-elastic simulation data and wind speed measurements. The process is then applied to an example roller bearing. The final program covers both standstill conditions and pitch cycles. The first is the main addition to former approaches. With existing test rigs and a reasonable budget and timeline, the program can be executed.
- Preprint
(4561 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Matthias Stammler
Status: open (until 04 Oct 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-97', Anonymous Referee #1, 04 Sep 2023
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://wes.copernicus.org/preprints/wes-2023-97/wes-2023-97-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Matthias Stammler, 06 Sep 2023
reply
The author thanks the reviewer for its time and effort.
Regarding the comment on line 77: The original sentence reads "In operation, only one of the axial rollers at the same circumferential position bears the load." The author admits this wording lacks elegancy, while he would argue it is still correct because of the additional "at the same circumferential position. The new version reads "In operation, only one of the axial rows at the same circumferential position bears the load."
The author agrees with the reviewer about the relevance of the works of the Mannheim tribology center, which have been published before the FVA reports. Also, Mannheim has published numerous important papers since 2006. To the best knowledgeof the author, the Mannheim publications do not cover line contact results, however, and have thus not been a part of the reference list. But since this work makes use of the terms "Standstill marks" and "False Brinelling" as firstly brought forward by Grebe, the author added this remark and points to the respective publications.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-97-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Matthias Stammler, 06 Sep 2023
reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on wes-2023-97', Jonathan Keller, 22 Sep 2023
reply
General Comments
In this paper, the author sets out an ambitious goal: to outline a process for developing a wear test program for roller-type pitch bearings based on aero-elastic simulation data and wind speed measurements. In that respect, it provides a valuable potential contribution to the wind industry, as the only strict design requirement currently stated in IEC 61400-1 relates to the static load capacity; whereas, a much more vague requirement that “…consideration shall be given to the potential effect of insufficient lubrication due to small movement…“ relates to wear. The subject of this paper could indeed one day lead to greatly improved design and/or design verification requirements in IEC 61400-1 or an equivalent standard.
Specific Technical Comments
Line 103: I recommend that the authors have a look at Brinji, O., K. Fallahnezhad, and P.A. Meehan. 2020. “Analytical Model for Predicting False Brinelling in Bearings.” Wear 444–445: 203135. doi: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043164819313699. Additionally, there may be more recent works that cite this (see https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043164819313699#section-cited-by), which I would recommend having a quick look at as well. I will admit I have only briefly scanned this work and need more time to digest it myself, but it might change how the sentence at line 103 is written. Having said that, these works relate to false brinelling, rather than the more general “wear” described in line 103. I invite the author’s thoughts here in either agreement or disagreement.
Line 181: I certainly agree that the applied load can overcome the preload such that the roller is in clearance and no longer carries a load, thus Equation (9) is true. However, I have to wonder if this load Q that is set to 0 at this position, then must be carried by the roller opposite (180 degrees) from this position? Is that accounted for in the formulation? Effectively, we have a system of parallel springs that can only carry load in one direction. I invite the author’s thoughts here as well.
Minor Clarifying Comments
Line 20: For the more general wind audience, I recommend adding something like the following “…, which protect the raceway from wear by redistributing the grease in the pitch bearing, as explained…” to this sentence.
Line 29: I recommend adding “…decades, results of several wear tests…”. I also believe many of the sentences in lines 29-54 can/should be made into a single paragraph.
Lines 78-79: I will admit I don’t have experience with this type of bearing, so I don’t know the nomenclature. However, I think it’s a little clearer to say “One of the rings is typically C-shaped and split into two halves, as shown in Figure 1, where the outer ring is split.”
Lines 80: I think it’s a bit clearer to say for the general wind audience “When the blade, pitch bearing, and hub are assembled, the tensioning of the bolts of the c-shaped ring introduces the preload of the rollers.” Alternatively, it is typical that the outer ring is stationary with the hub, so one could say “When the pitch bearing and hub are assembled, …”
Line 85: Again for a more general audience, it might be worthwhile to add “…evaluating wear of the raceways, which are the surfaces of the bearing rings that contact the rolling elements.” It might even be worth it to label the inner ring, outer ring, and raceway surfaces in Figure 1.
Line 96: It feels like the sentence “The appearance of standstill marks has a characteristic undamaged central area” is at first a bit confusing (i.e. a mark that leaves no mark). I think something like “Standstill marks typically occur at the roller ends, often separated by an undamaged central area as shown in Figure 3” is clearer.
Line 131: It appears there are some typos here with the tilde. Same for line 320.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-97-RC2
Matthias Stammler
Matthias Stammler
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
218 | 88 | 10 | 316 | 3 | 4 |
- HTML: 218
- PDF: 88
- XML: 10
- Total: 316
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1