the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Analyzing the performance of vertical wind profilers in rain events
Abstract. This paper quantitatively analyzes the performance of SODAR and LIDAR wind profilers during precipitation events, focusing on their Range Availability (RA) and the representativeness of wind measurements. The wind profile and supporting meteorological data have been collected in Barreirinhas and Paulino Neves, Maranhão, Brazil, at various locations, both near and far from the shoreline. The results show that precipitation affects the RA of SODAR, which, although it recovers quickly after the rain, shows significant drops in more consistent events. On the other hand, the LIDAR near the coast had little influence from rainfall on its RA. In contrast, when the LIDAR is far from the coast, it showed more significant variability, with drops in RA not necessarily linked to rainfall events. The investigation has concluded that the location and specific meteorological conditions significantly influence the performance of these wind profilers and should be considered when choosing the technology for estimating the vertical wind profile.
- Preprint
(1693 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
- RC1: 'Reviewer's Comment on wes-2024-132', Anonymous Referee #1, 09 Dec 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on wes-2024-132', Anonymous Referee #2, 19 Dec 2024
The paper investigates the performance of SODAR and LIDAR vertical wind profilers during precipitation events, focusing on their Range Availability (RA) and the reliability of wind speed measurements. The study analyzes data from the Brazilian equatorial coastal region, comparing observations near and far from the shoreline. Results indicate that rainfall significantly impacts SODAR performance while having minimal effects on LIDAR near the coast. The findings aim to guide the selection of wind profiling technologies for regions with high rainfall and varying meteorological conditions. The paper has multiple unique strengths including (1) covering both SODAR and LIDAR profilers, providing a comparative assessment of their performance under varying conditions (with metrics such as Pearson Correlation); (2) addressing a critical issue for wind energy project developers in regions with high rainfall, offering actionable insights for technology selection; (3) relatively good 14 months of data (both dry and rainy) and (4) highlighting the importance of location (near vs. far from the coast) in determining the performance of LIDAR and SODAR technologies. However, multiple areas need to be addressed:
- The findings are specific to the studied region, with limited discussion on how the results might apply to other geographic areas or climates.
- The paper does not address the potential trade-offs between accuracy and computational or operational costs of using LIDAR versus SODAR.
- While Pearson correlation is used to validate the representativeness of the measurements, no detailed analysis is provided for extreme weather events or edge cases.
- Key terms such as "dynamic recovery" for SODAR and specific RA thresholds for decision-making are not well-defined.
- Some sections, such as the methodology and results, lack clarity in distinguishing novel contributions from existing literature.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-132-RC2
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
96 | 27 | 7 | 130 | 5 | 5 |
- HTML: 96
- PDF: 27
- XML: 7
- Total: 130
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1