the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Coleman free aero-elastic stability methods for three- and two-bladed floating wind turbines
Abstract. An accurate prediction of aerodynamic damping is important for floating wind turbines, which can enter into resonant low frequency motion. Since the Coleman transform is not valid for two-bladed floating wind turbines, we here pursue methods that do not rely on it. We derive a time domain model that takes into account the dynamic stall phenomenon and which is used for developing Coleman free aero-eleastic stability analysis methods which can quantify the damping without actual simulation. It contains four structural degrees of freedom, namely the floater's pitch angle and the blade deflection amplitudes, as well as three dynamic stall aerodynamic degrees of freedom, one for each blade. The time domain model is linearized by considering part of the aerodynamic forcing as an added damping contribution. The linearized model is then made time independent through the application of Hill's or Floquet's method. This enables the possibility to carry out a stability analysis where the eigenvalues results obtained with both methods are compared. A first modal analysis serves to demonstrate the influence of aerodynamic damping through the variation of the dynamic stall time constant. Thereafter, a second modal analysis is reported as a Campbell diagram also for cross-comparison of the Hill- and Floquet- based results. Moreover, the blade degrees of freedom are converted from the rotational basis to the non-rotational one using the Coleman transform so that results in both frames can further be cross-validated. Finally, we apply the validated stability methods to a two-bladed floating wind turbine and demonstrate their functionality. The stability analysis for the two-bladed wind turbine yields new insight into the blade modal damping and is discussed with comparison to the three-bladed analysis.
- Preprint
(3137 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (extended)
-
RC1: 'Comment on wes-2024-136', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Dec 2024
reply
Article provides an analysis technique for aero-elastic stability of turbines using Hill’s method. It is relevant as it provides an alternative method to the “classical” approach of the multi-blade/Coleman transformation, which is generally implemented to three bladed, symmetrical rotors. This is important as it gives a tool that can be extended to other general cases, such as two bladed (or N-bladed, thus N-degrees of freedom) wind turbines or anisotropic rotors. It is also relevant as the methods used are done within the floating wind turbine stability problem which involves wave periodicity and visits the dynamic stall instability problem which is relevant within the offshore floating wind turbines. Article is very comprehensive and well written!
Specific comments:
On section 4.3, I would show the mathematical procedure to select the principal eigenvalues and corresponding eigenfrequencies as done in section 5.4 for the principal eigenvalues of the Floquet method. Also, section 4.3 only offers the Christensen and Santos, 2005 and Genta,1998 references, vs many more in the Floquet theory section (5.4). If there is room for improvement in that section, that would be very good in my opinion. It would be nice to cite in Skjoldan and Hansen, 2009 in 5.4 if pertinent, since they also give a method to resolve the indeterminacy of modal frequencies in section 2.2.2.
On section 7.1.2 it would be nice to show the mathematical procedure in which the Floquet theory/Hill’s method results are reconstructed into the NR frame, as it is of high significance to interpret the results of these methods on Campbell diagrams, which is being shown by this paper but not necessarily thoroughly explained.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-136-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Bogdan Pamfil, 02 Jan 2025
reply
First of all, thank you very much for your review which was very comprehensive and had specific comments. They were clear and concise which made it easy for me to identify precisely where to implement the suggested corrections. That being said, I have added the few missing mathematical procedures and theoretical explanations that you have brought up for sections 4.3, 5.4 and 7.1.2.
For instance, I improved section 4.3 by including more references to support and justify our principal eigenvalues selection procedure when using Hill's method.
The correction also benefited section 5.4 with Floquet's theory. There, I introduced the method used by Skjoldan and Hansen (2009) to select the principal eigenvalues based on the Fourier expansion of the time varying mode shape vector.
As for section 7.1.2, I have added two equations to clarify how the eigenvalue results are reconstructed into the Non-Rotational (NR) frame.
Finally, let me know if I should attach parts of the revised manuscript to show these changes.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-136-AC1 -
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Jan 2025
reply
Hi,
I'm glad you found the comments helpful. It would be nice to see the implementation of those suggestions in the manuscript if possible, so please attach those. That being said, if those changes have been made I believe no more changes are necessary.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-136-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Bogdan Pamfil, 16 Jan 2025
reply
Hi
I have attached the updated paper manuscript in order for you to notice if your comments have been properly considered. It also includes other small corrections which have been suggested to me by colleagues in my department. I hope this helps in understanding how the changes have been implemented.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Bogdan Pamfil, 16 Jan 2025
reply
-
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Jan 2025
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Bogdan Pamfil, 02 Jan 2025
reply
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
165 | 38 | 9 | 212 | 8 | 5 |
- HTML: 165
- PDF: 38
- XML: 9
- Total: 212
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1