the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Wake Development in Floating Wind Turbines: New Insights and Open Dataset from Wind Tunnel Experiments
Abstract. Floating offshore wind turbines represent a promising new technology in offshore renewables, but they are still in their early stages with few prototypes and limited performance data. As part of the NETTUNO research project, this study examines how platform movement affects the aerodynamics of a floating wind turbine rotor and connects its load response to the evolution of its wake. Wind tunnel experiments were performed on a 1:75 scale model wind turbine subjected to platform movements in various directions. Collected data includes measurements of rotor loads and wind speed in the wake of the wind turbine at different downstream distances from the rotor. The study provides a detailed analysis of a selected portion of the data, while the entire dataset is accessible via an open repository. Results indicate that surge and pitch motions induce periodic thrust fluctuations, leading to variations in near wake velocity that peak at a reduced frequency of 0.6. Yaw motion causes oscillations in the yaw moment and lateral wake meandering. Combined surge and sway motions result in skewed apparent wind speed, causing both wake velocity fluctuations and lateral meandering. Increased turbulence intensity near the wake center suggests enhanced wake mixing and potentially a faster recovery beyond a distance of 5 diameters downstream. New experimental data may serve as a foundation for validating numerical simulation tools, while the main findings of the study are thought to provide valuable knowledge for optimizing future large-scale floating wind farms.
- Preprint
(10839 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 22 Dec 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on wes-2024-140', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Dec 2024
reply
See attached.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alessandro Fontanella, 07 Dec 2024
reply
Dear Referee,
Thank you for taking the time to review our manuscript. We greatly appreciate your comments, as they are precise and highly valuable in improving our work! We have a few questions about your comments to help us improve the article.
- The loads presented in Fig. 4 are derived by averaging the aerodynamic load measurements over 40 cycles of platform motion. The phrase “over one cycle of pitch motion” in the caption may be misleading. However, we seek clarification on the term “nominal curve” and the comparison you propose.
- The comment "A linear regression ... behavior for all cases" seems to consist of two disconnected items. We can provide more details about the asymmetry of the velocity profile. However, this is not connected to the linear regression shown in Fig. 5a and Fig. 5b. Could you clarify your point?
It would be helpful if you could provide more details on these two comments.
On behalf of all Co-Authors,
Alessandro FontanellaCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-140-AC1 -
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Dec 2024
reply
To clarify:1. By asking whether the traces in figure 4 represent "nominal curves," I mean to ask whether they are the measured responses of the platform or they represent a modeled or idealized response to the imposed motion.2. My apologies, there are in fact two separate comments listed together. They should be:A) "A linear regression is fitted to the measurements and is included in Figure 5a and Figure 5b. This method of representation demonstrates that the loads change linearly with respect to the platform motion amplitude, as evidenced by the normalized points aligning with the regression line.: --- The loads response indicated by the markers in FIgure 5 do not appear to follow a linear trend. For the 2 Hz case, both the thrust and the Torque seem to deviate from a linear trend established by the other cases.B) "The velocity profile has a double-gaussian shape, and it is mostly unaffected by platform motion" --- Can the authors elaborate why the velocity profile is asymmetric with y? There appears to be a lateral shift in the mean profile of approximately 0.15 m and the peak deficit in the right side of the plot shows complex behavior for all cases.Citation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/wes-2024-140-RC2
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alessandro Fontanella, 07 Dec 2024
reply
Data sets
NETTUNO Experiment 1 – Wake Development in Floating Wind Turbines Alessandro Fontanella, Alberto Fusetti, Francesco Menconi, Stefano Cioni, Francesco Papi, Sara Muggiasca, Giacomo Persico, Vincenzo Dossena, Alessandro Bianchini, and Marco Belloli https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13994980
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
147 | 49 | 10 | 206 | 2 | 3 |
- HTML: 147
- PDF: 49
- XML: 10
- Total: 206
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 3
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1