the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Full-Scale Wind Turbine Performance Assessment: A Study of Aerodynamic Degradation and Operational Influences
Abstract. This study investigates how blade aerodynamic modifications, including Leading Edge Roughness (LER), influence offshore wind turbine performance over their operational lifespan. Developing a novel methodology, this research analyses data from twelve multi-megawatt turbines over a twelve-year period, focusing on the intricate relationship between blade erosion, blade enhancements, operations and maintenance events, control PLC parameter updates, and their cumulative impact on turbine efficiency. The analysis hinges on the integration of SCADA data, Operations and Maintenance (O\&M) records, and air density corrections. A key contribution is the development of a Turbine Performance Integral (TPI) method, which leverages generator speed and power output data to track performance trajectories. Seasonal-Trend decomposition using Locally Estimated Scatterplot Smoothing (STL) further isolates long-term trends and seasonal variations in performance. Overcoming data availability and quality limitations, the study reveals significant findings concerning software updates impacts on turbine control strategies, the variable effects of blade repairs and enhancements and the complex interaction between O\&M events and performance. This study's strength lies in its methodical approach and statistical rigour, offering a path forward in the quest for optimised wind turbine efficiency and advancing renewable energy.
- Preprint
(819 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
CC1: 'Comment on wes-2024-21', Davide Astolfi, 05 Mar 2024
Figures 1 and 2 of the paper are very similar to Figures 11 and 15 in https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5623. I suggest citing this reference, as well as others similar on the subject (wind turbine performance degradation analysis).
Disclaimer: this community comment is written by an individual and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of their employer.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-21-CC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Tahir Malik, 24 May 2024
Thank you. Citation added.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-21-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Tahir Malik, 24 May 2024
-
RC1: 'Comment on wes-2024-21', Anonymous Referee #1, 19 Mar 2024
The manuscript addresses a relevant topic in the wind industry, providing a novel methodology to assess the impact of blade aerodynamic modifications on turbine performance, using SCADA and O&M data. The paper highlights the complexity of the study and the challenges encountered in completing the initial goal of the study.
The paper is well structured and in general clear - even though some details can be improved to facilitate the readability of the paper (see my comments attached). Otherwise, very good job!
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Tahir Malik, 24 May 2024
Dear Peer Reviewer,
Thank you for your valuable and insightful comments on our manuscript. Your feedback has been instrumental in improving the quality and clarity of the paper.
Attached, you will find a detailed response to each of your comments, along with an updated version of the manuscript reflecting these improvements, which will be uploaded shortly.
Thank you once again for your thorough review and constructive suggestions.
Best regards,
Tahir Malik
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Tahir Malik, 24 May 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on wes-2024-21', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 Apr 2024
The manuscript presents an analysis of the effect of software updates and various maintenance activities on turbine performance. An interesting and novel approach is proposed for measuring turbine performance in time in the form of a virtual sensor signal called TPI, and the effect of software updates and different maintenance activities is analysed in terms of the gradient of TPI in a given time range, indicating a positive or negative effect in turbine performance.
The long-term trend in TPI reveals that the software updates during the first ~5 years of the data lead to mostly positive effects in turbine performance, with mixed trends among turbines for the later section of data with no more software updates. However, the results regarding the maintenance activities are relatively inconclusive, with a large variance in the TPI gradient in most of the maintenance activities. The authors present an in-depth explanation of the uncertainties involved, which limit the practicality of the analysis given the available data.
Despite the limited success in achieving the defined goals, the manuscript presents a novel and interesting approach for monitoring turbine performance through time, which can prove valuable in similar future studies. Furthermore, it provides a good and detailed explanation of the limitations of the method and the sources of uncertainty involved, which can also prove valuable for fellow researchers.
In a nutshell, I think the manuscript is a decent contribution and is suitable for publication in the journal, with some minor revisions listed below:
- There are numerous typos and grammatical errors that need to be fixed.
- Citations are mixed with the body of text, leading to misunderstanding. I suggest wrapping them in brackets.
- Line 188: The range between 20% and 37% seems quite specific. How was it defined? Visually or according to a max allowed change in pitch?
- Section 2.8 General comment: Brief explanations of the methods implemented, the context, and the reasons for the analyses are missing.
- Line 248 - "Normality Assessment": Ambiguous. More context is needed in terms of "what" and "why".
- Line 389: How is the time window selected for the calculation of the gradient?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-21-RC2 -
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Tahir Malik, 24 May 2024
Dear Peer Reviewer,
Thank you for your valuable and insightful comments on our manuscript. Your feedback has been instrumental in improving the quality and clarity of the paper.
Attached, you will find a detailed response to each of your comments, along with an updated version of the manuscript reflecting these improvements, which will be uploaded shortly.
Thank you once again for your thorough review and constructive suggestions.
Best regards,
Tahir Malik
Status: closed
-
CC1: 'Comment on wes-2024-21', Davide Astolfi, 05 Mar 2024
Figures 1 and 2 of the paper are very similar to Figures 11 and 15 in https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5623. I suggest citing this reference, as well as others similar on the subject (wind turbine performance degradation analysis).
Disclaimer: this community comment is written by an individual and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of their employer.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-21-CC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Tahir Malik, 24 May 2024
Thank you. Citation added.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-21-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Tahir Malik, 24 May 2024
-
RC1: 'Comment on wes-2024-21', Anonymous Referee #1, 19 Mar 2024
The manuscript addresses a relevant topic in the wind industry, providing a novel methodology to assess the impact of blade aerodynamic modifications on turbine performance, using SCADA and O&M data. The paper highlights the complexity of the study and the challenges encountered in completing the initial goal of the study.
The paper is well structured and in general clear - even though some details can be improved to facilitate the readability of the paper (see my comments attached). Otherwise, very good job!
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Tahir Malik, 24 May 2024
Dear Peer Reviewer,
Thank you for your valuable and insightful comments on our manuscript. Your feedback has been instrumental in improving the quality and clarity of the paper.
Attached, you will find a detailed response to each of your comments, along with an updated version of the manuscript reflecting these improvements, which will be uploaded shortly.
Thank you once again for your thorough review and constructive suggestions.
Best regards,
Tahir Malik
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Tahir Malik, 24 May 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on wes-2024-21', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 Apr 2024
The manuscript presents an analysis of the effect of software updates and various maintenance activities on turbine performance. An interesting and novel approach is proposed for measuring turbine performance in time in the form of a virtual sensor signal called TPI, and the effect of software updates and different maintenance activities is analysed in terms of the gradient of TPI in a given time range, indicating a positive or negative effect in turbine performance.
The long-term trend in TPI reveals that the software updates during the first ~5 years of the data lead to mostly positive effects in turbine performance, with mixed trends among turbines for the later section of data with no more software updates. However, the results regarding the maintenance activities are relatively inconclusive, with a large variance in the TPI gradient in most of the maintenance activities. The authors present an in-depth explanation of the uncertainties involved, which limit the practicality of the analysis given the available data.
Despite the limited success in achieving the defined goals, the manuscript presents a novel and interesting approach for monitoring turbine performance through time, which can prove valuable in similar future studies. Furthermore, it provides a good and detailed explanation of the limitations of the method and the sources of uncertainty involved, which can also prove valuable for fellow researchers.
In a nutshell, I think the manuscript is a decent contribution and is suitable for publication in the journal, with some minor revisions listed below:
- There are numerous typos and grammatical errors that need to be fixed.
- Citations are mixed with the body of text, leading to misunderstanding. I suggest wrapping them in brackets.
- Line 188: The range between 20% and 37% seems quite specific. How was it defined? Visually or according to a max allowed change in pitch?
- Section 2.8 General comment: Brief explanations of the methods implemented, the context, and the reasons for the analyses are missing.
- Line 248 - "Normality Assessment": Ambiguous. More context is needed in terms of "what" and "why".
- Line 389: How is the time window selected for the calculation of the gradient?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-21-RC2 -
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Tahir Malik, 24 May 2024
Dear Peer Reviewer,
Thank you for your valuable and insightful comments on our manuscript. Your feedback has been instrumental in improving the quality and clarity of the paper.
Attached, you will find a detailed response to each of your comments, along with an updated version of the manuscript reflecting these improvements, which will be uploaded shortly.
Thank you once again for your thorough review and constructive suggestions.
Best regards,
Tahir Malik
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
530 | 127 | 43 | 700 | 20 | 18 |
- HTML: 530
- PDF: 127
- XML: 43
- Total: 700
- BibTeX: 20
- EndNote: 18
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1