the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Machine learning based virtual load sensors for mooring lines using motion and lidar measurements
Abstract. Floating offshore wind turbines are equipped with a diverse array of sensors, offering valuable data for turbine control and monitoring. However, reliable measurements can be elusive and costly for specific physical parameters, particularly load estimations for mooring lines and fairleads. This research delves into a methodology where floater motion measurements and wind speed measurements, derived from forward-looking nacelle-based lidar, are utilized as inputs for different types of neural networks to estimate fairlead tension time series and damage equivalent loads (DELs). Mooring line loads are intrinsically linked to the dynamics and the position of the floater. Therefore, we systematically analyze the individual contribution of floater dynamics on the prediction quality of fairlead tension time series and DELs. Wind speed measurements obtained via nacelle-based lidar on floating offshore wind turbines are influenced inherently by the platform's dynamics, notably the rotational pitch displacement and surge displacement of the floater. Consequently, the lidar wind speed data indirectly contains the dynamic behavior of the floater, which, in turn, governs the fairlead loads. This study directly leverages lidar-measured Line of Sight (LOS) wind speeds to estimate mooring line tensions. Training data for the model is generated by the aero-elastic wind turbine simulation tool, openFAST, in conjunction with the numerical lidar simulation framework ViConDAR. The fairlead tension time series are predicted using long-short-term-memory (LSTM) networks. DEL predictions are made using three different approaches. First, DELs are calculated from predicted time series; second, DELs are predicted using a sequence-to-one LSTM architecture, and third, DELs are predicted using a convolutional neural network architecture. Results indicate that fairlead tension time series and DELs can be accurately estimated from floater motion time series. Further, we found that lidar LOS measurements do not improve time series or DEL predictions if motion measurements are available. However, using lidar measurements as model inputs for DEL predictions leads to similar accuracies as using displacement measurements of the floater.
- Preprint
(1412 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on wes-2024-25', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Mar 2024
The paper deals with a very interesting and innovative topic, which is the use of LiDAR and SCADA data for a model-based estimate of mooring lines damage equivalent loads. The research design is accurate and the simulations are extensively and clearly described. The results are well presented and coherent.
I understand that, given the innovativeness of the work, there are not so many references against which comparing. Anyway, I think that a deeper discussion about how good the results of Figure 10 are could improve the manuscript. Similarly, I am interested in further insights about how the results and the importance of the various features might change when dealing with measured, instead than simulated, data.
Finally, the most important remark I have on the paper is that in my opinion it is fundamental to give the reader as soon as possible the information that the manuscript deals with simulated data. Therefore, I suggest to change the title in something like "Machine learning based virtual load sensors for mooring lines using simulated motion and lidar measurements".
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-25-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on wes-2024-25', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 May 2024
The paper addresses core knowledge regarding influence of environmental conditions on mooring line loadings. The title is indeed misleading as suggested by another peer-review (e.g., Does it only estimate fairlead tension time series + DELs or also mooring line tensions). The relevant scientific questions are presented with specific details. The structure is well formed, with relevant figures and tables to describe the findings.
I did miss some validation steps, since the load sensors are virtual, the machine learning models have high uncertainty in themselves and using a virtual lidar is only able to replicate what we understand about the atmosphere. I have provided the relevant comments at specific locations, where I am missing the link or need more information and I hope the author is able to revise the manuscript to accommodate these requests. -
AC1: 'Comment on wes-2024-25', Moritz Gräfe, 03 Jul 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://wes.copernicus.org/preprints/wes-2024-25/wes-2024-25-AC1-supplement.pdf
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on wes-2024-25', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Mar 2024
The paper deals with a very interesting and innovative topic, which is the use of LiDAR and SCADA data for a model-based estimate of mooring lines damage equivalent loads. The research design is accurate and the simulations are extensively and clearly described. The results are well presented and coherent.
I understand that, given the innovativeness of the work, there are not so many references against which comparing. Anyway, I think that a deeper discussion about how good the results of Figure 10 are could improve the manuscript. Similarly, I am interested in further insights about how the results and the importance of the various features might change when dealing with measured, instead than simulated, data.
Finally, the most important remark I have on the paper is that in my opinion it is fundamental to give the reader as soon as possible the information that the manuscript deals with simulated data. Therefore, I suggest to change the title in something like "Machine learning based virtual load sensors for mooring lines using simulated motion and lidar measurements".
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-25-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on wes-2024-25', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 May 2024
The paper addresses core knowledge regarding influence of environmental conditions on mooring line loadings. The title is indeed misleading as suggested by another peer-review (e.g., Does it only estimate fairlead tension time series + DELs or also mooring line tensions). The relevant scientific questions are presented with specific details. The structure is well formed, with relevant figures and tables to describe the findings.
I did miss some validation steps, since the load sensors are virtual, the machine learning models have high uncertainty in themselves and using a virtual lidar is only able to replicate what we understand about the atmosphere. I have provided the relevant comments at specific locations, where I am missing the link or need more information and I hope the author is able to revise the manuscript to accommodate these requests. -
AC1: 'Comment on wes-2024-25', Moritz Gräfe, 03 Jul 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://wes.copernicus.org/preprints/wes-2024-25/wes-2024-25-AC1-supplement.pdf
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
423 | 97 | 26 | 546 | 24 | 17 |
- HTML: 423
- PDF: 97
- XML: 26
- Total: 546
- BibTeX: 24
- EndNote: 17
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1