the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Flow acceleration statistics: a new paradigm for wind-driven loads, towards probabilistic turbine design
Abstract. A method is developed to identify load-driving events based on filtered flow accelerations, regardless of the event-generating mechanism or specific temporal signature. Low-pass filtering enables calculation of acceleration statistics per characteristic turbine response time; this circumvents the classic problem of small-scale noise dominating the observed accelerations or extremes, while providing a way to deal with different turbines and controllers. Not only is the flow acceleration physically meaningful, but its use also removes the need for de-trending. Through consideration of the 99th percentile (P99) of filtered acceleration per each 10-minute period, we avoid assumptions about distributions of fluctuations or turbulence, and derive statistics of load-driving accelerations for offshore conditions from 'fast' (10 and 20 Hz) measurements spanning more than 16 years. These statistics scale with low-pass filter frequency (reciprocal turbine response time), but in a nontrivial manner varying with height due to the influence of the atmospheric boundary-layer’s capping inversion as well as the surface.
We find long-term probability distributions of 10-minute P99 of filtered accelerations, which drive loads ranging from fatigue to ultimate; this also includes joint distributions of the P99 with 10-minute mean wind speed (U) or standard deviation of horizontal wind speed fluctuations (σu). The long-term mean and mode of the P99 of streamwise accelerations, conditioned on σu and U, are found to vary monotonically with σs and U respectively; this corroborates the IEC 61400-1 prescriptions for fatigue design-load cases. An analogous relationship is also seen between lateral (directional) accelerations and standard deviation of direction, particularly for sub-mesoscale fluctuations.
The largest (extreme) P99 of filtered accelerations are seen to be independent of 10-minute mean speeds, and with only limited connection to 10-minute σu ; traditional 10-minute statistics cannot be translated into extreme load-driving acceleration statistics. From measurement heights of 100 m and 160 m, timeseries of the 10 most extreme acceleration events per 1 m s–1 wind speed bin were further investigated; events of diverse character were found to arise from numerous mechanisms, ranging from non-turbulent to turbulent regimes, also depending on the filter scale. Different behaviors were noted in the lateral and streamwise directions at different heights, though a fraction of these events exhibited extreme amplitudes for both horizontal acceleration components and/or were observed at both heights within a given 10-minute window. Via fits to the tails of the marginal P99 distributions, curves of offshore extreme P99 of filtered accelerations for return periods up to 50 years were calculated, for three characteristic turbine response times (filter scales) at the observation heights of 100 m and 160 m.
To drive aeroelastic simulations, Mann-model parameters were also calculated from the timeseries of the most extreme events, allowing constrained simulations embedding the recorded events. To facilitate this for typical industrial measurements which lack three-dimensional anemometry, a new technique for obtaining Mann-model turbulence parameters was also created; this was employed to find the parameters corresponding to the background flow behind the identified extremes and their timeseries. Further, a method was created to use the extreme acceleration statistics in stochastic simulations for application to loads, including interpretation within the context of the IEC 61400-1 standard. Preliminary parallel work has documented aeroelastic simulations conducted using the extreme event timeseries identified here, as well as Monte Carlo simulations based on the extreme statistics and new method for stochastic generation of acceleration events.
- Preprint
(2459 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on wes-2024-69', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Jul 2024
The manuscript is well-written and the structure is logical. The results are well described. The manuscript may be published after some minor revisions. My comments are as follows:
1. Clearer and higher resolution images are more important for reader understanding
2. Can you consider adding more model evaluation indicators?
3. Show some comparison results with recent studies.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-69-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply to RC1', Mark Kelly, 04 Oct 2024
Thank you for the comments. I'll reply to them individually.
"1. Clearer and higher resolution images are more important for reader understanding."
These will be provided in the final PDF document.
"2. Can you consider adding more model evaluation indicators?"
It is not clear what model you refer to. The main contribution/advancement of this work is the conception of filtered flow-acceleration metrics towards statistical characterization of transients for better loads simulation; there is not really a predictive model here to evaluate. However, estimation of the 10-minute P99 of filtered acceleration expected for a given return period is given; as a conservative indication of (maximum) uncertainty in this, Fig.15 includes bands showing the possible variation in the result due to the full range of possible base periods.
"3. Show some comparison results with recent studies."
This request is a bit unclear, as the work describes a new paradigm (and methodology) — exceedence statistics of filtered flow accelerations — whose ‘results’ are given statistically. The paper refers to works by McWilliam et al., who have used it for loads calculations and comparisons with e.g. the IEC 61400-1 standard. Further comparisons are beyond the scope of this (already quite long) article, and left for follow-up investigations.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-69-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply to RC1', Mark Kelly, 04 Oct 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on wes-2024-69', Anonymous Referee #2, 30 Dec 2024
Wes-204-69
Flow acceleration statistics: a new paradigm for wind-driven loads, towards probabilistic turbine design
Mark Kelly
Dear authors,
This paper dealt with the flow acceleration focusing on offshore wind. By employing low pass filtering on the measured data, the characteristics of the influential turbulence related to wind turbine time scale were carefully examined. The manuscript was well written based on rigid data analyses, but this reviewer has following comments.
1) Research objective needs to be clarified in more clear way. Research gap and motivation were unclear because of the structure in abstract and introduction.
2) For determination method of the wind acceleration in Section2, the author examined appropriate ways for the calculation by comparing the methods discretizing the wind speed numerically and based on power spectral density. However, Eq. (1) is not precisely correct because F[ds/dt] = (2pif)F[s], but not (spif)^2S_ss. Please explain why the inverse Fourier transform of the power spectral density corresponds to the wind speed acceleration.
3) In Section 2.1 and Figure 2, the authors showed the effect of the filter on the max and top percentiles; however, the decrease of the values by increasing the cut-off filter time scale is very natural consequences. This reviewer could not follow the physical meaning to show these results as the preliminary demonstration.
4) As for Figure 4, the top 1-10 values are explained, but they are unclear in Figure 4. From the cumulative density in the vertical axis, it is unclear which values correspond to certain percentiles.
5) Figure 6 and 7 are very interesting to see the relationship between the acceleration and statistics. The results are clearly presented to clarify the linear relationship between the acceleration and standard deviation. This reviewer recommends adding the physical
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-69-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply to RC2', Mark Kelly, 04 Jan 2025
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on wes-2024-69', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Jul 2024
The manuscript is well-written and the structure is logical. The results are well described. The manuscript may be published after some minor revisions. My comments are as follows:
1. Clearer and higher resolution images are more important for reader understanding
2. Can you consider adding more model evaluation indicators?
3. Show some comparison results with recent studies.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-69-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply to RC1', Mark Kelly, 04 Oct 2024
Thank you for the comments. I'll reply to them individually.
"1. Clearer and higher resolution images are more important for reader understanding."
These will be provided in the final PDF document.
"2. Can you consider adding more model evaluation indicators?"
It is not clear what model you refer to. The main contribution/advancement of this work is the conception of filtered flow-acceleration metrics towards statistical characterization of transients for better loads simulation; there is not really a predictive model here to evaluate. However, estimation of the 10-minute P99 of filtered acceleration expected for a given return period is given; as a conservative indication of (maximum) uncertainty in this, Fig.15 includes bands showing the possible variation in the result due to the full range of possible base periods.
"3. Show some comparison results with recent studies."
This request is a bit unclear, as the work describes a new paradigm (and methodology) — exceedence statistics of filtered flow accelerations — whose ‘results’ are given statistically. The paper refers to works by McWilliam et al., who have used it for loads calculations and comparisons with e.g. the IEC 61400-1 standard. Further comparisons are beyond the scope of this (already quite long) article, and left for follow-up investigations.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-69-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply to RC1', Mark Kelly, 04 Oct 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on wes-2024-69', Anonymous Referee #2, 30 Dec 2024
Wes-204-69
Flow acceleration statistics: a new paradigm for wind-driven loads, towards probabilistic turbine design
Mark Kelly
Dear authors,
This paper dealt with the flow acceleration focusing on offshore wind. By employing low pass filtering on the measured data, the characteristics of the influential turbulence related to wind turbine time scale were carefully examined. The manuscript was well written based on rigid data analyses, but this reviewer has following comments.
1) Research objective needs to be clarified in more clear way. Research gap and motivation were unclear because of the structure in abstract and introduction.
2) For determination method of the wind acceleration in Section2, the author examined appropriate ways for the calculation by comparing the methods discretizing the wind speed numerically and based on power spectral density. However, Eq. (1) is not precisely correct because F[ds/dt] = (2pif)F[s], but not (spif)^2S_ss. Please explain why the inverse Fourier transform of the power spectral density corresponds to the wind speed acceleration.
3) In Section 2.1 and Figure 2, the authors showed the effect of the filter on the max and top percentiles; however, the decrease of the values by increasing the cut-off filter time scale is very natural consequences. This reviewer could not follow the physical meaning to show these results as the preliminary demonstration.
4) As for Figure 4, the top 1-10 values are explained, but they are unclear in Figure 4. From the cumulative density in the vertical axis, it is unclear which values correspond to certain percentiles.
5) Figure 6 and 7 are very interesting to see the relationship between the acceleration and statistics. The results are clearly presented to clarify the linear relationship between the acceleration and standard deviation. This reviewer recommends adding the physical
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-69-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply to RC2', Mark Kelly, 04 Jan 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
348 | 93 | 148 | 589 | 19 | 18 |
- HTML: 348
- PDF: 93
- XML: 148
- Total: 589
- BibTeX: 19
- EndNote: 18
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1