<span>Reliable wind-turbine prognostics and health management requires anomaly detectors that limit false-alarm burden without concealing missed events. This study evaluates chronological calibration of principal component analysis (PCA) reconstruction error on CARE to Compare v6, which contains 5 242 948 real ten-minute supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) records from 36 turbines in three wind farms. Turbine identities were partitioned before evaluation into 23 development turbines (58 cases) and 13 locked-test turbines (37 cases). Within each case, PCA was fitted on an earlier normal block, and a disjoint chronological block calibrated the alert threshold. Development-only selection chose global conformal PCA with α = 0.005. On the locked test set it achieved a CARE-style score of 0.506 (farm–turbine cluster-bootstrap 95 % confidence interval 0.378–0.632), compared with 0.252 for a fixed-contamination isolation forest comparator; the paired difference was 0.249 (95 % confidence interval 0.026–0.466). Mean normal-case accuracy increased from 0.252 to 0.865, and false-positive events decreased from 17 to 4. However, only 5 of 18 anomaly events were detected, including none of the five events in Farm A. A development-tuned isolation forest scored 0.542 and a conformalized isolation forest scored 0.502; neither paired comparison distinguished the selected PCA method. Ordinary empirical calibration generated exactly the same locked-test alerts as the finite-sample conformal rank rule. The evidence supports chronological, identity-disjoint calibration as a transparent reference for SCADA health monitoring, but it does not support universal superiority of PCA or of its conformal rank correction. We report the negative and equivalence findings in full so that the benchmark can be reused and contested.</span>