<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" specific-use="SMUR" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">WESD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Wind Energy Science Discussions</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">WESD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<publisher><publisher-name></publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/wes-2026-176</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>What matters for wind farm layout optimization? An assessment based on the effective layout distance</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Baricchio</surname>
<given-names>Matteo</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8548-3866</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Iori</surname>
<given-names>Jenna</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1211-7321</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gebraad</surname>
<given-names>Pieter M. O.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>van Wingerden</surname>
<given-names>Jan-Willem</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3061-7442</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<addr-line>Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<label>3</label>
<addr-line>Youwind, Barcelona, Spain</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>08</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>2026</volume>
<fpage>1</fpage>
<lpage>33</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2026 Matteo Baricchio et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://wes.copernicus.org/preprints/wes-2026-176/">This article is available from https://wes.copernicus.org/preprints/wes-2026-176/</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://wes.copernicus.org/preprints/wes-2026-176/wes-2026-176.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://wes.copernicus.org/preprints/wes-2026-176/wes-2026-176.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>Wind farm layout optimization is one of the main phases of offshore wind farm design and involves a wide range of implementation choices, spanning aspects such as flow modeling, data selection, and objective definition. This study quantifies the impact of 18 different implementation choices across 9 categories on the results of wind farm layout optimization. The comparison is performed using both a conventional approach based on performance metrics and the concept of &lt;em&gt;effective layout distance&lt;/em&gt;, a novel metric introduced to measure differences between sets of layouts based solely on turbine positions. The results show that the hyperparameter values of the optimization algorithm, the choice of wake model, the use of cost of valued energy as objective, and the adoption of a control co-design approach have a high impact on the optimal layouts and therefore require careful consideration during problem formulation. In contrast, choices such as rotor averaging models and the use of revenues based on varying electricity prices as objective have a negligible effect on the resulting layouts and can therefore be selected based on simplicity and computational efficiency.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="33"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>