Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-177
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-177
07 Mar 2024
 | 07 Mar 2024
Status: a revised version of this preprint was accepted for the journal WES and is expected to appear here in due course.

Improving Wind and Power Predictions via Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation in the WRF Model: Case Study of Storms in February 2022 at Belgian Offshore Wind Farms

Tsvetelina Ivanova, Sara Porchetta, Sophia Buckingham, Jeroen van Beeck, and Wim Munters

Abstract. Accurate wind and power predictions from numerical models are crucial for wind farm operation and management. This study explores how these predictions can be improved by assimilating local offshore data into a numerical weather prediction model, while simultaneously taking into account the presence of neighboring wind farms. The focus is on the Belgian-Dutch wind farm cluster located in the Southern Bight of the North Sea. Our results show that, for the current case study with extreme weather conditions, the assimilation of upstream data reduces mean absolute errors of wind speed, wind direction, and power predictions, up to 2.7 times in comparison to simulations without any assimilation. This approach can be useful for forecasting purposes in short- to mid-term horizons, as well as for a long-term refined reanalysis of various weather conditions and events.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Tsvetelina Ivanova, Sara Porchetta, Sophia Buckingham, Jeroen van Beeck, and Wim Munters

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-177', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Apr 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on wes-2023-177', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 Apr 2024
  • AC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-177: Final response', Tsvetelina Ivanova, 07 Jul 2024

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-177', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Apr 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on wes-2023-177', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 Apr 2024
  • AC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-177: Final response', Tsvetelina Ivanova, 07 Jul 2024
Tsvetelina Ivanova, Sara Porchetta, Sophia Buckingham, Jeroen van Beeck, and Wim Munters
Tsvetelina Ivanova, Sara Porchetta, Sophia Buckingham, Jeroen van Beeck, and Wim Munters

Viewed

Total article views: 781 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
560 195 26 781 17 20
  • HTML: 560
  • PDF: 195
  • XML: 26
  • Total: 781
  • BibTeX: 17
  • EndNote: 20
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 Mar 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 Mar 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 758 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 758 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
This study explores how wind and power predictions can be improved by introducing local forcing of measurement data in a numerical weather model, while taking into account the presence of neighboring wind farms. Practical implications for the wind energy industry include insights for informed offshore wind farm planning and decision-making strategies using open-source models, even under adverse weather conditions.
Altmetrics