the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Improving Wind and Power Predictions via Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation in the WRF Model: Case Study of Storms in February 2022 at Belgian Offshore Wind Farms
Abstract. Accurate wind and power predictions from numerical models are crucial for wind farm operation and management. This study explores how these predictions can be improved by assimilating local offshore data into a numerical weather prediction model, while simultaneously taking into account the presence of neighboring wind farms. The focus is on the Belgian-Dutch wind farm cluster located in the Southern Bight of the North Sea. Our results show that, for the current case study with extreme weather conditions, the assimilation of upstream data reduces mean absolute errors of wind speed, wind direction, and power predictions, up to 2.7 times in comparison to simulations without any assimilation. This approach can be useful for forecasting purposes in short- to mid-term horizons, as well as for a long-term refined reanalysis of various weather conditions and events.
- Preprint
(13537 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
- RC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-177', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Apr 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on wes-2023-177', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 Apr 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://wes.copernicus.org/preprints/wes-2023-177/wes-2023-177-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-177: Final response', Tsvetelina Ivanova, 07 Jul 2024
We thank both anonymous reviewers for their insightful suggestions and remarks, which helped us to improve the manuscript, as well as to revisit, re-frame, and clarify our goals. We believe this has significantly enhanced the quality of our study. Please find attached our responses to both reviewers.
Tsvetelina Ivanova, on behalf of all co-authors.
Status: closed
- RC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-177', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Apr 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on wes-2023-177', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 Apr 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://wes.copernicus.org/preprints/wes-2023-177/wes-2023-177-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Comment on wes-2023-177: Final response', Tsvetelina Ivanova, 07 Jul 2024
We thank both anonymous reviewers for their insightful suggestions and remarks, which helped us to improve the manuscript, as well as to revisit, re-frame, and clarify our goals. We believe this has significantly enhanced the quality of our study. Please find attached our responses to both reviewers.
Tsvetelina Ivanova, on behalf of all co-authors.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
560 | 195 | 26 | 781 | 17 | 20 |
- HTML: 560
- PDF: 195
- XML: 26
- Total: 781
- BibTeX: 17
- EndNote: 20
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1