the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Methodology for the engineering calculation of flaps on Wind Turbines using BEM codes
Abstract. Aeroelastic codes based on Blade Element Momentum theory are the standard used by many wind turbine designers. These codes usually include models and corrections for unsteady aerodynamics, tip and root effect, tower shadow and other effects. In general, this kind of codes does not include models to adequately simulate aerodynamic control devices. This paper presents a method to take into account the unsteady contributions due to the flap motion (based on indicial models) and the spanwise effects (based on circulation theory), in order to simulate flaps on the blades. This method can be included in BEM codes in general and it could also be applied to another kind of control devices. The validation and verification show the accuracy of this method using experimental data for two-dimensional unsteady cases, and CFD for three-dimensional steady and unsteady cases.
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Withdrawal notice
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Preprint
(806 KB)
Interactive discussion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1e88/d1e88ae28dd38aa3383d0209e0a08a4398747e0a" alt="Printer-friendly Version"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d906/9d906c6c1efcf34b3c3c568c80579b1f37b8add4" alt="Supplement"
-
RC1: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Feb 2017
-
AC1: 'Answer Review', Maria Aparicio-Sanchez, 09 Feb 2017
-
AC1: 'Answer Review', Maria Aparicio-Sanchez, 09 Feb 2017
-
RC2: 'Review of Aparicio-Sanchez et al. Manuscript', Anonymous Referee #2, 23 Feb 2017
-
AC2: 'Answer review', Maria Aparicio-Sanchez, 07 Mar 2017
-
AC2: 'Answer review', Maria Aparicio-Sanchez, 07 Mar 2017
-
RC3: 'Review of paper wes 2016-50', Spyros Voutsinas, 28 Feb 2017
-
AC3: 'Answer', Maria Aparicio-Sanchez, 07 Mar 2017
-
AC3: 'Answer', Maria Aparicio-Sanchez, 07 Mar 2017
Interactive discussion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1e88/d1e88ae28dd38aa3383d0209e0a08a4398747e0a" alt="Printer-friendly Version"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d906/9d906c6c1efcf34b3c3c568c80579b1f37b8add4" alt="Supplement"
-
RC1: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Feb 2017
-
AC1: 'Answer Review', Maria Aparicio-Sanchez, 09 Feb 2017
-
AC1: 'Answer Review', Maria Aparicio-Sanchez, 09 Feb 2017
-
RC2: 'Review of Aparicio-Sanchez et al. Manuscript', Anonymous Referee #2, 23 Feb 2017
-
AC2: 'Answer review', Maria Aparicio-Sanchez, 07 Mar 2017
-
AC2: 'Answer review', Maria Aparicio-Sanchez, 07 Mar 2017
-
RC3: 'Review of paper wes 2016-50', Spyros Voutsinas, 28 Feb 2017
-
AC3: 'Answer', Maria Aparicio-Sanchez, 07 Mar 2017
-
AC3: 'Answer', Maria Aparicio-Sanchez, 07 Mar 2017
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
944 | 408 | 112 | 1,464 | 135 | 151 |
- HTML: 944
- PDF: 408
- XML: 112
- Total: 1,464
- BibTeX: 135
- EndNote: 151
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1