the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Near wake behavior of an asymmetric wind turbine rotor
Abstract. With symmetric rotors, tip vortex helices develop regularly before interacting, following the leapfrogging instability. This instability can occur earlier when the helices are radially offset by using blades of different lengths. This study investigates the spatio-temporal development of near-wake behavior for rotors with a significant blade length difference. Large eddy simulations with an actuator line model were conducted on a modified NREL 5MW wind turbine under both laminar and turbulent inflow conditions, to evaluate the impact of blade length differences ranging from 5 to 30 %. The study analyzed the development of tip vortex helices, the onset of leapfrogging, vortex merging, and, ultimately, their three-dimensional breakdown. The analysis is corroborated using a simplified two-dimensional point vortex model. The results show that the leapfrogging process begins immediately downstream of the vortex release when blades of different lengths are considered. The instability growth rate obtained from the 2D vortex model agrees with the LES results. Although the rotor asymmetry accelerates the leapfrogging and, in some conditions, also the vortex merging process, it proves insufficient to cause a large-scale breakdown of the helix system and, therefore, enhance wake recovery. Inflow turbulence, however, plays a larger role in wake recovery, promoting the breakdown of tip helical vortices regardless of rotor symmetry.
- Preprint
(6573 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on wes-2024-122', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Dec 2024
See comments in the supplemental PDF. In general, I recommend this manuscript to be reconsidered after some major revisions, mainly:
1) Add in the introduction and possibly also in the conclusions a better elaboration on what the added value of this research is in the larger wind energy science context.
2) Clean up the language of the manuscript. I marked some sentences that are hard to read or understand, but there were plenty more that I did not mark, especially in the second part of the paper. I would seriously consider having a writing specialist go through the paper for this purpose, as I feel the level of English is currently sub-par and at some moments simply sloppy.
3) Improve quality of the captions; right now, none of the figures are comprehensible without reading the accompanying text.
4) Clean up the mathematical nomenclature used in the manuscript. Parameters are regularly not used consistently or not defined at all, making it hard to understand or reproduce the work.
5) Consider moving/renaming some sections/paragraphs around as suggested in the PDF.
- RC2: 'Comment on wes-2024-122', Anonymous Referee #2, 04 Jan 2025
- RC3: 'Comment on wes-2024-122', Anonymous Referee #3, 09 Jan 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
213 | 61 | 9 | 283 | 9 | 6 |
- HTML: 213
- PDF: 61
- XML: 9
- Total: 283
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1