Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-139
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-139
18 Dec 2024
 | 18 Dec 2024
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

Optimal Flight Pattern Debate for Airborne Wind Energy Systems: Circular or Figure-of-eight?

Dylan Eijkelhof, Nicola Rossi, and Roland Schmehl

Abstract. The computational study compares the performance of circular and figure-of-eight flight patterns for fixed-wing ground-generation airborne wind energy (AWE) systems using a PID-based basic controller that effectively controls the kite during each patterns pumping cycle in a Matlab® Simulink® environment. A simple, adjustable control framework enables a steady analysis within consistent operational parameters, allowing for fair comparisons of power output, power quality, ground surface area requirements, and structural load impacts. The simulation results reveal that using the 150 m2 MegAWES reference kite at 15 ms−1 the circular flight pattern achieves the highest cycle-averaged power output, providing 1.85 MW at a power density of 2.94 MWkm−2, making it advantageous for maximizing energy within limited spatial constraints. Conversely, the figure-of-eight down-loop pattern demonstrates superior power quality with lower power peaks (a peak-to-average-power ratio of 3.85) and lower expected structural fatigue due to a reduced load frequency of 0.034 Hz, supporting greater operational stability and system longevity. The up-loop variation performed the worst on all metrics considered in this work. This study offers insights into the trade-offs between energy output, efficiency, and structural demands associated with each flight path, providing a foundation for future AWE flight path selection and control strategy optimizations.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Dylan Eijkelhof, Nicola Rossi, and Roland Schmehl

Status: open (until 15 Jan 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Dylan Eijkelhof, Nicola Rossi, and Roland Schmehl
Dylan Eijkelhof, Nicola Rossi, and Roland Schmehl
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 18 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
This study compares circular and figure-of-eight flight shapes for flying kite wind energy systems, assessing power output, stability, and system lifespan. Results show that circular patterns are ideal for maximizing energy in compact areas, while figure-of-eight paths, especially flying up in the centre of the figure, deliver smoother, more consistent power and have a longer expected kite lifespan. These findings offer valuable insights to enhance design and performance of kite systems.
Altmetrics