the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Influence of simple terrain on the spatial variability of a low-level jet and wind farm performance in the AWAKEN field campaign
Abstract. In wind energy research, scientific challenges are often associated with complex terrain sites, where orography, vegetation, and buildings disrupt flow uniformity. However, even sites characterized as simple terrain can exhibit significant spatial variability in wind speed, particularly during stable boundary layers (SBLs) and low-level jets (LLJs). This study investigates these terrain interactions using both simulations and observations from the American WAKe ExperimeNt (AWAKEN). We employ a multiscale Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model simulation, integrating mesoscale forcing in the coarse domains and representing three rows of turbines from the King Plains wind farm as generalized actuator disks (GAD) in the large-eddy simulation (LES) domains. During a nocturnal LLJ event on 3 April 2023, the downwind, wake-affected turbine rows outperformed the upwind, unwaked row by 25–51 %. This counterintuitive result arises from terrain-induced streamwise variations in hub-height wind speed of approximately 4 m s-1 over 5 km—equivalent to ~50 % of the upwind reference speed. This enhancement outweighs the wake-induced reduction in mean wind speed (~12 %) and global blockage effects reported in the literature (~1–3.4 %). The multiscale simulations capture the intra-farm spatial variability in power performance observed in SCADA data. Terrain-induced vertical displacement of the LLJ, coupled with large wind shear below the jet maximum, drives the substantial streamwise acceleration within the wind farm. These findings underscore the importance of accounting for spatial variability related to terrain, even in simple landscapes, particularly during LLJ conditions. Incorporating such effects into reduced-order modeling frameworks for wind farm design and control could significantly enhance their effectiveness.
- Preprint
(27951 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 10 Feb 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on wes-2024-166', Anonymous Referee #1, 19 Jan 2025
reply
In this article, the authors investigated the impact of 'simple terrain' (characterized by slight elevation variations of less than 50 m) on wind farm power production under stable stratification with Low-Level jets (LLJs). The study utilized WRF-LES-GAD simulations and corroborated with the observational data from wind farms at the AWAKEN site. The article is well-written and the addressed details on the impact of simple terrain on wind farm performance is beneficial to wind energy community. I recommend for the publication of this article by addressing my minor comments on technical details as follows.
- It is unclear how the frictional velocity was evaluated for the chosen site based on the requirements outlined in lines 134–136 to determine the necessary grid resolution.
- Details regarding the simulation setup for domains D1, D2, and D3 are not sufficiently clear, particularly how the simulations were conducted. Including a flowchart of the simulation setup, either in the Appendix or Section 2.2, would help clarify this. Such a flowchart could detail the initial conditions based on the HRRR model and their integration with the GAD framework, which would be beneficial for readers.
- What do the black vertical lines in Figures 11 and 12 represent? Additionally, what is the significance of the dotted lines in Figure 4? I would expect them to indicate the tips of the wind turbine blades; however, please confirm this and make any necessary changes to the figure captions.
- The variables used in the text are typeset with LaTeX, whereas those in the figures are not. While this is a minor point, maintaining consistency between the text and figures would enhance the overall presentation.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-166-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 | 36 | 3 | 139 | 1 | 0 |
- HTML: 100
- PDF: 36
- XML: 3
- Total: 139
- BibTeX: 1
- EndNote: 0
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1