Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-188
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-188
29 Jan 2025
 | 29 Jan 2025
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

Field comparison of load-based wind turbine wake tracking with a scanning lidar reference

David Onnen, Gunner Christian Larsen, Alan Wai Hou Lio, Paul Hulsman, Martin Kühn, and Vlaho Petrović

Abstract. Wind farm control concepts require awareness and observation methods of the inner-farm flow field. The relative location of the wake, to which a downstream turbine is exposed, is of high interest. It can be used as feedback to support closed-loop wake-steering control, ultimately leading to higher power extraction and fatigue load reduction. With increasing fidelity, not only time-averaged wakes but also instantaneous wake conditions, subject to meandering and wind direction changes, are considered within a controller. This paper presents a quantitative field comparison of two independently applied wake centre estimation methods: a scanning lidar and an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) based on the rotor loads of the waked turbine. No ground truth is available in the field environment, therefore the methodology accounts for the fact that two uncertain estimates are compared. The lidar estimates, with a derived uncertainty in the order of 0.05 rotor diameters D, can be used as a suitably precise reference to draw conclusions regarding the load-based EKF. The EKF uses Coleman-transformed blade root bending moments, linked to the wake centre position via an analytical model with a low number of tuning parameters. The model can easily be trained with aeroelastic simulations including the Dynamic Wake Meandering model. The formulation adds robustness to the tracking and allows to determine the confidence in the wake position estimate, which can be used for wake impingement detection or for a wake-steering controller to judge whether a yaw manoeuvre is adequate. The results indicate agreement of the methods with root-mean-square errors of 0.2 D for low and moderate turbulence intensity, and 0.3 D for turbulence intensities above 12 %. The paper focuses on wake position estimation but also outlines a methodology, how wind farm models or wind field reconstruction techniques can be validated with complementary lidar data.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
David Onnen, Gunner Christian Larsen, Alan Wai Hou Lio, Paul Hulsman, Martin Kühn, and Vlaho Petrović

Status: open (until 26 Feb 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
David Onnen, Gunner Christian Larsen, Alan Wai Hou Lio, Paul Hulsman, Martin Kühn, and Vlaho Petrović
David Onnen, Gunner Christian Larsen, Alan Wai Hou Lio, Paul Hulsman, Martin Kühn, and Vlaho Petrović

Viewed

Total article views: 31 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
28 2 1 31 0 0
  • HTML: 28
  • PDF: 2
  • XML: 1
  • Total: 31
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Jan 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Jan 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 31 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 31 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 30 Jan 2025
Download
Short summary
Neighbouring wind turbines influence each other, as they leave a complex footprint of reduced wind speed and changed turbulence in the flow, called wake. Modern wind farm control sees the turbines as team players and aims to mitigate the negative effects of such interaction. To do so, the exact flow situation in the wind farm must be known. We show, how to use wind turbines as sensors for waked inflow, test this in the field and compare with independent laser measurements of the flow field.
Altmetrics