Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-126
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-126
29 Jul 2025
 | 29 Jul 2025
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

Boundary layer structure and parameterization uncertainties affecting wind turbine hub-height predictions: A comparative assessment of New England and Florida

Adam Ayouche, Baylor Fox-Kemper, and Nathan J. M. Laxague

Abstract. As wind energy development expands to diverse geographical regions, understanding the complex atmospheric conditions that turbines encounter is essential for accurate resource assessment and operational forecasting. This study presents an analysis of boundary layer structure, thermodynamic forcing mechanisms, and model parameterization uncertainties affecting hub-height winds using North American Mesoscale Forecast System (NAM) data and one-dimensional RANS simulations. Our analysis reveals important regional and seasonal variations in atmospheric boundary layer characteristics between New England and Florida. In New England, hub-height to PBL ratios frequently exceed critical thresholds during summer convective conditions, indicating turbine operation above the shallow atmospheric boundary layer, while Florida maintains more consistent conditions with ratios well below these thresholds year-round. Thermodynamic forcing shows similarly distinct patterns, with New England experiencing strong seasonal CAPE variations between winter and summer compared to Florida's consistently elevated values. Systematic evaluation of NAM turbulence parameterization reveals moderate correlations with resolved turbulence but significant biases across the TKE spectrum. Controlled numerical experiments demonstrate that different turbulence closure schemes and vertical resolution configurations produce substantial variations in power density estimates, with the greatest deviations occurring under stable conditions.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Adam Ayouche, Baylor Fox-Kemper, and Nathan J. M. Laxague

Status: open (until 26 Aug 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Adam Ayouche, Baylor Fox-Kemper, and Nathan J. M. Laxague
Adam Ayouche, Baylor Fox-Kemper, and Nathan J. M. Laxague

Viewed

Total article views: 31 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
26 4 1 31 0 0
  • HTML: 26
  • PDF: 4
  • XML: 1
  • Total: 31
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Jul 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Jul 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 31 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 31 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 30 Jul 2025
Download
Short summary
We studied how weather affects wind turbines in New England and Florida using weather forecast data. New England shows extreme seasonal changes, with turbines operating above the air mixing layer in summer, while Florida remains stable year-round. Weather forecast models produce large errors, especially during calm nights common in New England. These regional differences and model uncertainties matter when planning wind farms and estimating power across climates.
Share
Altmetrics