Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-188
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-188
30 Oct 2025
 | 30 Oct 2025
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Proposed Areas for Offshore Wind Implementation with Monte Carlo Method

Cristina Mata, Daniel Romero, and Niels Cornelis Adema

Abstract. This research presents a comparative study on offshore wind energy site selection, focusing on technological, environmental, social, and regulatory barriers, while ensuring compatibility with other marine activities and habitats. The study applies Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and contrasts it with a probabilistic approach based on Monte Carlo simulations. Although AHP is widely used, its deterministic nature limits the representation of uncertainty in decision-making. To address this, Monte Carlo methods are applied independently, extending previous approaches by incorporating additional design criteria and enhancing robustness. Results demonstrate that integrating probabilistic uncertainty significantly improves the reliability of site selection, identifying optimal zones with higher confidence. Overall, the study highlights the advantages of Monte Carlo simulations over AHP in supporting sustainable and reliable offshore wind energy planning.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Cristina Mata, Daniel Romero, and Niels Cornelis Adema

Status: open (until 27 Nov 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Cristina Mata, Daniel Romero, and Niels Cornelis Adema
Cristina Mata, Daniel Romero, and Niels Cornelis Adema

Viewed

Total article views: 34 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
28 4 2 34 2 2
  • HTML: 28
  • PDF: 4
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 34
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 30 Oct 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 30 Oct 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 34 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 34 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 31 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
This study examines how to choose the best locations for offshore wind farms. Researchers compared a traditional ranking method with a probability-based approach using computer simulations. The probability method better handles uncertainties by testing thousands of scenarios. Results showed this approach identifies suitable locations with greater confidence. This improved decision-making could help planners build environmentally sustainable and economically viable wind farms.
Share
Altmetrics