the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Power Output and Downstream Wake Modifications of Floating Turbines Subjected to Ocean Motions Using a Tension-Leg Platform
Abstract. A concern in the deployment of large wind turbines on ocean floating platforms is the effect of floating platform motions on their electrical power generation. Further, it is not clear how floating motions influence waking, which might affect the combined power generation of collections of turbines. We examine the average power output of a single and a collection of 5 MW wind turbines, mounted on a Tension-Leg Platform (TLP) under the action of fully developed ocean wave motions, coupling floating motions with Large Eddy Simulation (LES) of atmospheric and rotor dynamics. The ocean dynamics enter as fully developed waves derived from the Pierson-Moskowitz spectrum. To assess the influence of ocean motions we performed simulations under multiple turbulence intensities, reporting comparisons of average power output when the platforms are allowed to move to when they are held rigidly in place. In all simulations, we find that the effects of TLP floating platform's induced motions have a minor effect on single and multiple turbine power production and wake structure. Even when using coherent and large amplitude harmonic floating induced perturbations, any significant wake modifications from floating motions are confined to the near-wake region, where downstream turbines are unlikely to be located. The relatively small amplitude of TLP motions relative to pre-existing turbulent fluctuations are the primary reason for low wake and power modifications downstream.
- Preprint
(8809 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 17 Nov 2025)
- RC1: 'Comment on wes-2025-208', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Nov 2025 reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on wes-2025-208', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Nov 2025
reply
General comments
Dear Authors,
I was invited by the Associate Editor to review your article, and I gladly accepted since the topic is of great interest to me and closely aligned with my recent research. The aerodynamics and wake interactions within floating wind farms have recently attracted significant attention in the wind energy community, and I believe that your paper addresses a topic that could be of interest to the readership of Wind Energy Science.
However, I found the manuscript rather difficult to follow. In addition, it lacks fundamental details regarding the methodologies used to obtain the presented results. This makes it impossible to reproduce the findings or to properly assess them within the appropriate context.
Given these issues, I believe that the manuscript does not currently meet the quality standards required for publication in Wind Energy Science. In its present form, it cannot proceed further in the review process. I encourage the authors to reconsider the structure and content of the paper, address the identified shortcomings, and resubmit once these have been resolved.
Specific comments
- The phrasing is often awkward, and several terms are used inappropriately. For example, the expressions “ocean motions,” “ocean floating platforms,” “ocean dynamics,” and “floating platform ocean turbines” are unclear and not standard. The authors should revise these terms to improve accuracy and readability of the text.
- The introduction does not clearly identify the research questions addressed in the paper or explain how the article advances beyond the current state of the art.
- The results are obtained for a TLP foundation, which has distinct dynamic characteristics compared to other floating concepts such as spars and semisubmersibles (e.g., smaller motion amplitudes). Therefore, the results cannot be generalized to all floating wind turbine types and are specific to TLP systems. The authors should clearly describe the particular TLP configuration considered in their work and provide sufficient information about it for other researchers to reproduce the results.
- It is not clear which wind turbine model was used in the simulations. This information is essential for contextualizing the results of the article and ensuring they can be reproduced by others. The authors should specify the wind turbine they considered, including its key parameters.
- Previous studies on floating wind turbine wakes have shown that the presence of flow structures coherent with platform motion depends on the free-stream turbulence intensity. This is a key parameter for the problem investigated in the paper. Since the authors use LES, where turbulence modeling plays a central role, they should clarify how the free-stream flow was generated and justify the selection of the three turbulence intensities considered. In particular, it should be explained how the low- and high-turbulence inflows were defined and implemented.
- The wind turbine performance under varying inflow conditions strongly depends on the control strategy applied to the rotor. However, no information is provided about the control approach used in the simulations. This is a very important omission, as the control system significantly affects the aerodynamic response and the resulting wake dynamics.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-208-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 162 | 20 | 10 | 192 | 12 | 12 |
- HTML: 162
- PDF: 20
- XML: 10
- Total: 192
- BibTeX: 12
- EndNote: 12
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Dear authors,
dear editor,
please find my review on the paper under discussion attached.
Best,
Christian W. Schulz