the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Sensor-Error-Robust Normal Behavior Modeling for Wind Turbine Failure Prediction Using a Masked Autoencoder
Abstract. Condition monitoring and failure prediction in wind turbines has become an increasingly important research area due to its substantial economic impact. Accurate early detection of developing faults enables more efficient maintenance planning and minimizes costly downtime. However, predicting failures from operational wind farm data remains challenging. Real-world datasets are often affected by measurement noise, incomplete expert knowledge, and extraneous operating conditions, all of which complicate the identification and classification of emerging problems. This work presents a methodology designed to address one critical obstacle: measurement errors caused by faulty or unreliable sensors. Such errors can substantially degrade the performance of Normal Behavior Models (NBM), thereby hindering the detection of anomalies and incipient failures. To mitigate this issue, we introduce an approach based on masked autoencoders (MAE) that selectively suppresses signals deemed unreliable by domain experts or automated diagnostics. The proposed method is evaluated using four datasets from real operational wind farms. We analyze the impact of sensor-induced errors on NBM performance and demonstrate how the MAE framework improves robustness in the presence of corrupted measurements. The results highlight the potential of the method to improve the reliability of data-driven failure prediction systems in practical wind turbine applications.
- Preprint
(2370 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 01 Feb 2026)
- RC1: 'Comment on wes-2025-280', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Jan 2026 reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on wes-2025-280', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Jan 2026
reply
The paper proposes a fault diagnosis and prediction method based on SCADA data from wind turbines. From the results, it is evident that training models with a sufficient amount of data can enable the prediction of certain faults, demonstrating practical significance. The authors are advised to consider the following issues:
- The proposed model’s performance is analyzed in terms of reconstruction errors under masked sensor errors and nominal conditions, as well as its ability to distinguish between healthy and unhealthy data. To better demonstrate the superiority of the model, it is recommended to include comparisons with other models, particularly in the prediction aspect.
- The authors’ work primarily relies on SCADA data for analysis, and the fault information is mainly based on faults that can be reported in wind farms. Therefore, the authors should further emphasize the practical significance of the proposed method in key sections.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-280-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 142 | 42 | 12 | 196 | 9 | 12 |
- HTML: 142
- PDF: 42
- XML: 12
- Total: 196
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 12
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
In this paper, the authors describe a methodology to detect malfunctioning or inoperable wind turbine drivetrain sensor readings and then correct for their effect on other diagnostic indicators. Two examples of “masking” of these faulted sensors are given, and the accuracy of the historical fault diagnoses are recalculated. The article addresses an important real-life problem and the first few Sections are well written. However, not being well-versed in autoencoders I had difficulty interpreting the Figures shown in the Results section and related text, which is also relatively brief. My biggest desire in revision would be to expand the Results section in this respect. I also offer additional comments in the attachment.