the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Impact of Boundary Layer Height and Large-Scale Turbulence on the Efficiency and Loads of Offshore Wind Farms
Abstract. The increasing scales of modern wind energy systems, with rotor diameters exceeding 250 m and hub heights above 150 m, introduces new challenges in understanding interactions between atmospheric dynamics and wind farm performance. This study investigates the impact of atmospheric boundary layer height (BLH) as a key parameter influencing wind farm efficiency and turbine loads. Using mesoscale simulations from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model combined with lidar measurements, we quantify BLH variability and its associated uncertainty across three representative sites in the North and Baltic Seas. A series of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations for a wind farm, containing 100 15 MW turbines, under varying BLH and wind speed conditions reveal significant efficiency differences linked to atmospheric stratification, with lower BLH generally reducing farm efficiency. Seasonal and site-specific climatologies highlight that Baltic Sea conditions, characterized by larger extent of low BLH conditions, lead to reduced performance compared to North Sea sites. Furthermore, we assess the influence of large-scale coherent turbulence structures on turbine loads through aeroelastic simulations of both bottom-fixed and floating configurations. The results show that low-frequency fluctuations, often absent in standard design models, increase fatigue loads within wind farms, particularly for turbines in wake-affected regions. These findings underscore the need to incorporate BLH variability and large-scale turbulence effects into engineering models for reliable performance and load predictions of next-generation offshore wind farms.
Competing interests: Two of the (co-)authors are a members of the editorial board of Wind Energy Science.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(12052 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on wes-2025-286', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Jan 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://wes.copernicus.org/preprints/wes-2025-286/wes-2025-286-RC1-supplement.pdfCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/wes-2025-286-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Stefan Ivanell, 30 Jun 2026
The authors thank the reviewer for the time taken reviewing the paper and the helpful comments. This
document specifies the modifications made according to the comments received by the reviewer. All changes
are highlighted in a separate pdf for simplicity in parallel to the new (clean) version of the manuscript. In
this document, we also comment on and discuss each review point made by the reviewer.
The input of the reviewer has improved the quality of the paper, we thank the reviewer for all contributions.Sincerely
Authors
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Stefan Ivanell, 30 Jun 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on wes-2025-286', Anonymous Referee #2, 15 Mar 2026
Publisher’s note: the supplement to this comment was edited on 23 March 2026. The adjustments were minor without effect on the scientific meaning.
Please find my comments attached.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Stefan Ivanell, 30 Jun 2026
The authors thank the reviewer for the time taken reviewing the paper and the helpful comments. This
document specifies the modifications made according to the comments received by the reviewer. All changes
are highlighted in a separate pdf for simplicity in parallel to the new (clean) version of the manuscript. In
this document, we also comment on and discuss each review point made by the reviewer.
The input of the reviewer has improved the quality of the paper, we thank the reviewer for all contributions.
Sincerely,
Authors
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Stefan Ivanell, 30 Jun 2026
-
RC3: 'Comment on wes-2025-286', Anonymous Referee #3, 20 Mar 2026
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Stefan Ivanell, 30 Jun 2026
The authors thank the reviewer for the time taken reviewing the paper and the helpful comments. This
document specifies the modifications made according to the comments received by the reviewer. All changes
are highlighted in a separate pdf for simplicity in parallel to the new (clean) version of the manuscript. In
this document, we also comment on and discuss each review point made by the reviewer.
The input of the reviewer has improved the quality of the paper, we thank the reviewer for all contributions.
Sincerely,
Authors
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Stefan Ivanell, 30 Jun 2026
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 639 | 283 | 35 | 957 | 33 | 63 |
- HTML: 639
- PDF: 283
- XML: 35
- Total: 957
- BibTeX: 33
- EndNote: 63
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1