Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-291
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-291
21 Jan 2026
 | 21 Jan 2026
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

A numerical study of the influence of terrain on wakes, blockage, wind farm efficiency, and turbine efficiency

James Bleeg

Abstract. This study investigates the interplay of terrain, blockage, and wake effects using Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations of 35 different combinations of terrain, wind farm layout, and atmospheric conditions. The terrain includes two idealized solitary ridgelines, an idealized valley, and flat ground. The wind farms comprise one or two rows of closely spaced turbines parallel to the terrain feature. We simulate these idealized wind farms in conventionally neutral boundary layers of different heights. The set of simulations also includes an existing onshore wind farm located along a ridgeline and run with stable and unstable surface conditions. The horizontal variation of the ground elevation (i.e. terrain) has a large influence on wake and blockage effects in this study. In addition, the predicted wind farm efficiency and turbine efficiency (power coefficient) vary significantly depending upon the terrain in the simulation and the position of the wind farm relative to the terrain. For single-row wind farms the predicted effect of terrain on wind farm efficiency can exceed 4% – for the simulated conditions. The separate but correlated effect of terrain on individual turbine efficiency is of a similar magnitude. Analysis of the results indicates that there are multiple physical drivers behind the efficiency trends, including streamwise pressure gradients and inviscid effects related to buoyancy. Energy prediction methods that do not account for these drivers have an elevated risk of producing large errors – at least at wind farms similar to those evaluated in the study.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
James Bleeg

Status: open (until 18 Feb 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on wes-2025-291', Anonymous Referee #1, 22 Jan 2026 reply
James Bleeg
James Bleeg

Viewed

Total article views: 144 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
91 48 5 144 2 2
  • HTML: 91
  • PDF: 48
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 144
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Jan 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Jan 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 143 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 143 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 24 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
Numerical simulations of 35 different combinations of terrain, wind farm layout, and atmospheric conditions indicate that terrain (i.e. ground elevation variation) can significantly influence wind farm flows and in turn energy extraction efficiency. An analysis of the simulation results identifies the main drivers behind these terrain effects. These influences should be accounted for when estimating the energy yield of a planned wind farm – at least for wind farms similar to those in this study.
Share
Altmetrics