Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-50
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-50
01 Apr 2025
 | 01 Apr 2025
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

Simulating wind farm flows at hub height with 2D Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations

Mads Baungaard, Takafumi Nishino, and Maarten Paul van der Laan

Abstract. Wind turbines in an offshore wind farm typically have the same hub height, and in this case, the power of a wind farm could be predicted if the flow field in the horizontal 2D plane at the hub height is predicted accurately. Nevertheless, Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations of wind farm flows are predominantly made in full 3D domains, which are naturally more computationally expensive than 2D simulations. In this work, a systematic comparison is made between 2D and 3D RANS simulations of various wind farm configurations to assess the differences in computational cost and accuracy. For our numerical setup and the cases considered, which include layouts with up to 144 turbines, it is found that the 2D simulations are at least two orders of magnitude computationally cheaper than their corresponding 3D simulations, while the predicted farm power is within -30 % to 15 % for all cases. Only minor, but necessary, modifications have been made to the governing 2D RANS equations to avoid unphysical decay of turbulence, allowing for a simple direct comparison between the 2D to 3D simulations. Given the low computational cost and already sensible performance of the only slightly modified 2D RANS simulations demonstrated in this work, it appears attractive to further investigate this methodology and possibly introduce additional 2D modifications to improve the accuracy in future work.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Mads Baungaard, Takafumi Nishino, and Maarten Paul van der Laan

Status: open (until 29 Apr 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Mads Baungaard, Takafumi Nishino, and Maarten Paul van der Laan
Mads Baungaard, Takafumi Nishino, and Maarten Paul van der Laan
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 01 Apr 2025
Download
Short summary
A systematic comparison between 2D and 3D Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations of wind farm flows have been conducted. It is found that the 2D simulations are, at least, two orders of magnitude computationally cheaper than their corresponding 3D simulations, while the predicted farm power is within -30 % to 15 % for all cases considered. The large computational speed-ups and sensible results makes 2D simulations a promising option in the low- to mid-fidelity range.
Share
Altmetrics