the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
An inter-comparison study on the impact of atmospheric boundary layer height on gigawatt-scale wind plant performance
Abstract. The height of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) exerts a significant influence on flow behavior within wind farms and directly impacts their performance. This study investigates how variations in ABL height and capping inversion layer thickness affect the efficiency and power output of a gigawatt-scale wind farm. Five advanced numerical approaches, ranging from high-fidelity large-eddy simulations (LES) to Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS), are used to model farm-scale flow dynamics under shallow (∼ 150 m) and deep (∼ 500 m) ABL conditions. The results consistently show that shallow ABLs increase flow blockage and turbine wake interactions, leading to reduced power production. In contrast, deeper ABLs promote enhanced wake recovery and increased overall energy yield. These trends were observed across all solvers, demonstrating the robustness of the findings. Notably, while some quantitative differences emerged depending on modeling fidelity and computational domain size, the overarching trends remained consistent among the participating research institutions and industry partners. The study concludes that the sensitivity to model type is limited and that ABL height and stability are critical parameters to consider in wind energy siting and turbine layout design to optimize performance across varying atmospheric conditions.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Wind Energy Science.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.- Preprint
(16058 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 02 Jul 2025)
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
42 | 8 | 2 | 52 | 1 | 1 |
- HTML: 42
- PDF: 8
- XML: 2
- Total: 52
- BibTeX: 1
- EndNote: 1
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1