Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-9
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-9
11 Feb 2025
 | 11 Feb 2025
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

Assessing the impact of wind profiles at offshore wind farm sites for field data-enabled design

Rebeca Marini, Konstantinos Vratsinis, Kayacan Kestel, Jonathan Sterckx, Jens Matthys, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, and Jan Helsen

Abstract. As wind turbines grow and wind farms become denser, more insight into real metocean conditions is essential for operational efficiency and load assessment. Light Detection And Ranging LiDAR) technology, which can substitute the use of meteorological masts, has garnered significant attention in the literature. However, it indirectly measures wind parameters, relying on assumptions and built-in algorithms. Wind field reconstruction (WFR) methods offer users greater control over LiDAR measurements, enabling customised flow assumptions and parameter estimation. These measurements were taken during a measurement campaign on a wind turbine in the Belgian offshore zone. The WFR method has detected weather events, such as high shear, during the measurement campaign. These events are also linked to on-site weather conditions by using open-source metocean data. The findings align with the current literature on the correlation between events and weather conditions and the clear difference between wind profiling and a power law wind profile for loads design as proposed by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard. The results emphasise the importance of real measurements in understanding wind field characteristics, offering improved accuracy compared to standard assumptions, such as the IEC power law profile used for load design. This work underscores the value of real-life wind profiling for designing and operating wind farms in offshore environments.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Rebeca Marini, Konstantinos Vratsinis, Kayacan Kestel, Jonathan Sterckx, Jens Matthys, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, and Jan Helsen

Status: open (until 11 Mar 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Rebeca Marini, Konstantinos Vratsinis, Kayacan Kestel, Jonathan Sterckx, Jens Matthys, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, and Jan Helsen
Rebeca Marini, Konstantinos Vratsinis, Kayacan Kestel, Jonathan Sterckx, Jens Matthys, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, and Jan Helsen

Viewed

Total article views: 82 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
69 11 2 82 0 2
  • HTML: 69
  • PDF: 11
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 82
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Feb 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Feb 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 81 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 81 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 20 Feb 2025
Download
Short summary
This work evaluated the wind profile in a Belgian offshore zone. The estimated wind profile was made using measurements that allow for reconstruction at heights along the rotor area. The IEC standard defines these profiles as a 1/7th power law, which is proven not to occur 100 % of the time. It is also possible to infer that there will be differences when using different wind profiles for load assessment, as more realistic profiles can lead to a better assessment of the wind turbine's lifetime.
Share
Altmetrics