the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Enhanced approach to match damage-equivalent loads in rotor blade fatigue testing
Abstract. In the design process of current wind turbine blades a critical step is the certification testing to confirm design assumptions and requirements. To demonstrate reliability in fatigue testing the blade shall be loaded in all areas of interest to the load levels, which at the end of such test campaign adequately represent the blade lifetime. These loads are typically derived from aero-elastic load calculations with a combination of different design load cases in the form of accumulated bending moment distributions. The current practice includes two fatigue test sequences, which are aligned with first flapwise and lead-lag modes respectively with the aim to reach defined target bending moment distributions. These two test sequences combined may not cover all areas of interests and some areas could be tested insufficiently. Also in some areas the conventional target bending moment formulation does not represent fatigue damage of the material correctly, as it is not derived from a stresses or strain based damage calculation and does not allow for mean load correction. The aim of this work is to demonstrate these shortcomings on a particular test case and propose an enhanced method to derive representative target loads, which cover all areas of interest and are strain proportional, allowing for correct material damage accumulation and mean load correction. It is shown for the test case that compared to the conventional methods the enhanced target loads require 16 % higher test loads at certain positions along the blade within the four main load directions and even more for load directions in between.
- Preprint
(4399 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
- RC1: 'Comment on wes-2025-99', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Sep 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on wes-2025-99', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 Sep 2025
Overall, this study highlights the significant underestimation of fatigue damage under the current standard and suggests a more accurate approach.
- Lines 93–108, The underlying assumptions are clearly explained, and the limitations of this study are also addressed.
- Line 258, The yaw angle probabilities may represent deviations from the theoretical optimum under power production. Perhaps an explanation is needed for the choice of these specific probabilities.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-99-RC2 -
RC3: 'Comment on wes-2025-99', Anonymous Referee #3, 29 Sep 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://wes.copernicus.org/preprints/wes-2025-99/wes-2025-99-RC3-supplement.pdf
- AC1: 'Comment on wes-2025-99', David Melcher, 04 Nov 2025
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 556 | 68 | 27 | 651 | 28 | 30 |
- HTML: 556
- PDF: 68
- XML: 27
- Total: 651
- BibTeX: 28
- EndNote: 30
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
This review is a compilation of several reviewers from ORE Catapult.
Overall, the paper is making a great argument for a damage-based approach to testing, which is obviously what is going to become the norm going forwards with the new release of IEC 61400-23.