Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-99
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-99
26 Aug 2025
 | 26 Aug 2025
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

Enhanced approach to match damage-equivalent loads in rotor blade fatigue testing

David Melcher, Sergei Semenov, Peter Berring, Kim Branner, and Enno Petersen

Abstract. In the design process of current wind turbine blades a critical step is the certification testing to confirm design assumptions and requirements. To demonstrate reliability in fatigue testing the blade shall be loaded in all areas of interest to the load levels, which at the end of such test campaign adequately represent the blade lifetime. These loads are typically derived from aero-elastic load calculations with a combination of different design load cases in the form of accumulated bending moment distributions. The current practice includes two fatigue test sequences, which are aligned with first flapwise and lead-lag modes respectively with the aim to reach defined target bending moment distributions. These two test sequences combined may not cover all areas of interests and some areas could be tested insufficiently. Also in some areas the conventional target bending moment formulation does not represent fatigue damage of the material correctly, as it is not derived from a stresses or strain based damage calculation and does not allow for mean load correction. The aim of this work is to demonstrate these shortcomings on a particular test case and propose an enhanced method to derive representative target loads, which cover all areas of interest and are strain proportional, allowing for correct material damage accumulation and mean load correction. It is shown for the test case that compared to the conventional methods the enhanced target loads require 16 % higher test loads at certain positions along the blade within the four main load directions and even more for load directions in between.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
David Melcher, Sergei Semenov, Peter Berring, Kim Branner, and Enno Petersen

Status: open (until 23 Sep 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
David Melcher, Sergei Semenov, Peter Berring, Kim Branner, and Enno Petersen
David Melcher, Sergei Semenov, Peter Berring, Kim Branner, and Enno Petersen

Viewed

Total article views: 33 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
28 3 2 33 1 1
  • HTML: 28
  • PDF: 3
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 33
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Aug 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Aug 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 33 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 33 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Aug 2025
Download
Short summary
It is shown that conventional methods in rotor blade fatigue testing can lead to substantial under-testing across major blade areas, as the material fatigue behavior is not represented well. An improved approach based on strain proportional loads with mean load correction is proposed to define loads, which result in sufficient fatigue damage throughout all blade areas. The results suggest that this can require up to 16 % higher uniaxial fatigue test loads than conventional methods.
Share
Altmetrics