Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-103
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-103
18 Sep 2026
 | 18 Sep 2026
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

A comprehensive evaluation and uncertainty quantification of offshore turbulence intensity from WRF mesoscale simulations

Sandra Schwegmann, Tanguy Lunel, Lukas Vollmer, and Martin Dörenkämper

Abstract. At the beginning of each wind energy project, an as accurate as possible characterization of the site-specific wind resources is needed for any economic considerations of the project. Besides wind speed and direction, which can be measured easily and of which the representation in models has been investigated in various studies, information about wind turbulence suffers from a lack of confidence yet, although it is one of the key parameters that define the lifetime of wind turbines, and its characteristics are of high importance already in the planning phase. In this study, we analyze the feasibility of the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) to represent this turbulence in terms of turbulence intensity (TI) over a full year in the North Sea and quantify the range of uncertainties. The impact of the planetary boundary layer scheme used for model simulation on these uncertainties was investigated as well as the usage of model-resolved and subgrid-scale turbulence. Furthermore, results were evaluated for increasing spatial resolution in the model and stability impacts. It was found that TI values based on subgrid-scale turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) are significantly closer to observations than model-resolved TI (i.e. based on standard deviation of wind speed or wind speed components). As modelled TKE decreases with increasing resolution, the factor used in the TI calculation needs to be adapted to obtain comparable TI to observations. Nevertheless, independent of the planetary boundary layer scheme, resolution and test location in the North Sea, the lowest errors for TI are around 0.024 (RMSE) and 30 % (MAPE). For any further improvement either LES simulations or a kind of correction method like Measure-Correlate-Predict (MCP) becomes necessary.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Sandra Schwegmann, Tanguy Lunel, Lukas Vollmer, and Martin Dörenkämper

Status: open (until 16 Oct 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Sandra Schwegmann, Tanguy Lunel, Lukas Vollmer, and Martin Dörenkämper
Sandra Schwegmann, Tanguy Lunel, Lukas Vollmer, and Martin Dörenkämper
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 18 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
This study investigates the feasibility of the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) to represent turbulence intensity (TI) and quantifies its uncertainties for the North Sea. At mesoscales, using subgrid-scale TKE for TI calculation, a mean absolute percentage error of about 30 % can be achieved. Out of the used PBL schemes, MYNN provides the lowest deviation to observed TI at a resolution of 2 km. Gray-zone simulations with a resolution of up to 111 m do rarely improve TI.
Share
Altmetrics