Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-178
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-178
20 Oct 2026
 | 20 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

Is a cost-optimal wind farm also carbon-optimal? A layout optimization and control co-design study

Matteo Baricchio, Samuel Kainz, Jan-Willem van Wingerden, and Carlo L. Bottasso

Abstract. Wind farm design and operation are traditionally driven by economic objectives, often overlooking environmental impacts. Although greenhouse gas emissions associated with wind energy are substantially lower than those of fossil-fuel-based plants, they are not negligible when assessed over the entire life cycle. This study investigates the impact of introducing a carbon-related objective alongside classical objectives, such as annual energy production and levelized cost of energy, into wind farm optimization. The analysis considers wind farm layout optimization, wind farm flow control, and the combined optimization of layout and control strategies, namely co-design. A range of case studies is examined, from illustrative examples to a large-scale offshore wind farm under varying site conditions. The results indicate that selecting a carbon-related objective yields economic performance very similar to the one obtained with conventional economic objectives, and vice versa, a significant (unexpected) finding with potentially far-reaching implications. This suggests that economic and environmental goals are largely aligned, and that prioritizing one does not necessarily compromise the other. Despite similar overall performance metrics, the resulting layouts differ in terms of turbine positions depending on the chosen objective and on whether layout and control are optimized jointly or sequentially.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Wind Energy Science.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Matteo Baricchio, Samuel Kainz, Jan-Willem van Wingerden, and Carlo L. Bottasso

Status: open (until 17 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Matteo Baricchio, Samuel Kainz, Jan-Willem van Wingerden, and Carlo L. Bottasso
Matteo Baricchio, Samuel Kainz, Jan-Willem van Wingerden, and Carlo L. Bottasso
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 20 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Layout and control of wind farms are traditionally optimized sequentially for economic objectives, often overlooking environmental impacts. This study investigates the effect of introducing a carbon-related objective into layout, control, and layout-control co-design optimization. Results for a large-scale offshore wind farm show that using an environmental objective can achieve economic performance comparable to that of conventional economic optimization, while the resulting layouts may differ.
Share
Altmetrics