Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-54
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-54
30 Mar 2026
 | 30 Mar 2026
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

Convolutional versus graph-based surrogate models for inter-farm wake prediction using multi-fidelity transfer learning

Jens Peter Schøler, Frederik Peder Weilmann Rasmussen, M. Paul van der Laan, Alfredo Peña, and Pierre-Elouan Réthoré

Abstract. Accurate prediction of wind farm wake interactions is important for energy yield assessment, as offshore wind farms increasingly operate in close proximity to one another. This work presents a systematic comparison of two neural network surrogate models for inter-farm wake deficit prediction: a convolutional neural network (CNN) based attention residual U-Net (ARU-Net) and a graph neural network (GNN) based graph neural operator (GNO). Both architectures are rained using multi-fidelity transfer learning. First, pre-trained on low-fidelity engineering model simulations, and second fine-tuned on high-fidelity Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes actuator wind farm (RANS-AWF) data. The models are evaluated on procedurally generated wind farm layouts spanning diverse farm sizes, turbine spacings, wind speeds, and ambient turbulence intensities. Both architectures achieve high prediction accuracy but exhibit complementary strengths: evaluated over the wake region (δw ≥ 10−3 m s−1) and averaged across both evaluation grids, the GNO achieves a lower RMSE (0.024 vs. 0.028 m s−1), while the ARU-Net attains a higher F1 score (0.98 vs. 0.91), reflecting its superior wake boundary capture. Transfer learning substantially benefits the ARU-Net, while the GNO shows only marginal improvement.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Wind Energy Science.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jens Peter Schøler, Frederik Peder Weilmann Rasmussen, M. Paul van der Laan, Alfredo Peña, and Pierre-Elouan Réthoré

Status: open (until 27 Apr 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jens Peter Schøler, Frederik Peder Weilmann Rasmussen, M. Paul van der Laan, Alfredo Peña, and Pierre-Elouan Réthoré

Data sets

Wind-Farm-GNO Jens Peter Schøler https://github.com/jenspeterschoeler/Wind-Farm-GNO

Model code and software

Wind-Farm-ARU-Net Frederik Peder Weilmann Rasmussen https://github.com/FPWRasmussen/Wind-Farm-ARU-Net

Jens Peter Schøler, Frederik Peder Weilmann Rasmussen, M. Paul van der Laan, Alfredo Peña, and Pierre-Elouan Réthoré
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 30 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
As offshore wind farms are built closer together, predicting how they affect each other becomes critical. We compared two AI approaches for this task, training both on cheap approximate data before refining them with expensive high-accuracy simulations. One predicts wake boundaries better, while the other estimates wind speeds more accurately, offering complementary tools for future wind farm design.
Share
Altmetrics