SCADA-free wind turbine drivetrain health monitoring using a physics-informed multivariate autoencoder
Abstract. Effective condition monitoring is critical for preventing costly machine failures. Vibration analysis is one of the most widely adopted condition monitoring approaches. It enables early fault detection by capturing subtle dynamic changes caused by misalignment, imbalance, and bearing wear. Traditional techniques rely on signal processing in the time and frequency domains, and experts manually track individual condition indicators to identify fault trends. The manual tracking of condition indicators becomes impossible when monitoring large fleets of complex machines, such as wind turbines. This research proposes a novel approach to consolidate multiple condition indicators into a single high-level health indicator to simplify the monitoring process. A physics-informed multivariate autoencoder models the machine's normal behaviour using vibration-based condition indicators computed from the vibration signal measured during healthy operation. The non-linear model incorporates operating conditions from vibration condition indicators, without using SCADA as input. It identifies faults by detecting deviations from the established normal behaviour. The proposed method is validated on NASA’s Intelligent Maintenance Systems bearing dataset and a multi-year offshore wind farm dataset with confirmed fault cases. Validation on a wind turbine drivetrain dataset demonstrated that the proposed method detects 100 % (19/19) of labelled fault cases. The model achieves 97 % balanced accuracy, and threshold optimisation further reduces false positives to 1 case out of 91 healthy cases, while maintaining high diagnostic sensitivity with only a single false negative (missed fault alarm). Results demonstrate that the proposed method reliably accommodates diverse condition indicators, effectively detects faults, and reduces the time required for condition monitoring analysis.
This paper proposes a wind turbine vibration condition monitoring method based on a physics-informed multivariate autoencoder. Verified and analyzed by experimental data, the proposed method can effectively fuse multi-dimensional vibration monitoring indicators, realize early fault diagnosis of wind turbines, and significantly reduce the labor cost and operation and maintenance pressure of manual condition monitoring. In general, the paper has a complete framework, clear logic and standardized writing. However, there still exist several issues to be improved and discussed in the research content. The specific revision suggestions are provided as follows.
1.It is suggested that the introduction section be further refined. On the basis of the review of current research status, the authors should explicitly state what this paper aims to accomplish and how it differs from previous studies.
2.There appears to be a formatting or rendering issue around Line 201, where unexpected symbols "??" are displayed. Please carefully check the manuscript formatting and correct this issue.
3.The description of Figure 5 is not sufficiently clear. Although the blue and red colours are described as representing the minimum and maximum values, respectively, the actual numerical values corresponding to these extrema are not provided. It is recommended to include the corresponding numerical values, either in the figure or in the caption, to improve the readability and facilitate quantitative interpretation.
4.Although the authors state that detailed information cannot be disclosed due to confidentiality, Section 2.2 investigates the correlation among signals from 11 vibration sensors. Therefore, it would be beneficial to provide a schematic illustration showing the approximate locations of these vibration sensors on the drivetrain. Such a schematic does not need to reveal confidential structural details but would greatly improve readers' understanding of the sensor configuration and the physical interpretation of the results.
5.The results indicate that the diagnostic performance is sensitive to the selected threshold. However, the current analysis only compares relatively high and low threshold values. It is observed that a higher threshold leads to false negatives (FN), while a lower threshold increases false positives (FP). It is recommended that the authors investigate several intermediate threshold values. This may provide a better trade-off between sensitivity and specificity and further improve the diagnostic performance.