Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-89
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-89
03 Jun 2026
 | 03 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

IEA Wind Task 46 Aerodynamic Benchmark: Computational Aerodynamics Approaches for Assessing Blade Airfoil Performance Reduction due to Leading Edge Degradation

Michele Sergio Campobasso, Alessio Castorrini, David Bretos, Beatriz Mendez, David C. Maniaci, Johannes N. Theron, Alexander Meyer Forsting, Niels Nørmark Sørensen, Kisorthman Vimalakanthan, Marco Caboni, Ruben Gutierrez, Yana Gorbachova, Aya Aihara, and Francesco Grasso

Abstract. Leading edge (LE) surface degradation of wind turbine (WT) blades caused by insect accumulation, erosion and other environmental agents reduces the aerodynamic performance of the blades, causing WT power and energy yield losses. Estimating these losses is paramount for cost-informed maintenance planning. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) can predict aerodynamic performance losses. However, sensitivity of these predictions to physical model choice and detailed model settings can be large. To assess this sensitivity, the International Energy Agency Task 46 – Erosion of Wind Turbine Blades, developed the First Aerodynamic Benchmark, presented herein. The performance degradation of the NACA 633-418 airfoil due to moderate and severe LE degradation, assessed experimentally in two wind tunnel measurement campaigns, is studied. The clean and degraded airfoil performance predicted by seven CFD codes and two low-fidelity methods are cross-compared and benchmarked against measurements. A utility-scale WT featuring the NACA 633-418 airfoil on the outboard blade is used to determine the resulting power and energy losses onshore and offshore. Most codes succeed in predicting the measured airfoil performance reduction due to moderate LE degradation before stall. Consequently, all energy loss estimates are close. Conversely, the variability of the predicted aerodynamic performance reduction due to severe LE degradation is larger, and the variability of the resulting energy losses is also larger than at moderate LE degradation. These results underline both the significant sensitivity to the specific analysis set-up and the need for further research into methods for predicting the impact of advanced LE degradation, such as geometry perturbation-resolving simulations.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Michele Sergio Campobasso, Alessio Castorrini, David Bretos, Beatriz Mendez, David C. Maniaci, Johannes N. Theron, Alexander Meyer Forsting, Niels Nørmark Sørensen, Kisorthman Vimalakanthan, Marco Caboni, Ruben Gutierrez, Yana Gorbachova, Aya Aihara, and Francesco Grasso

Status: open (until 01 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Michele Sergio Campobasso, Alessio Castorrini, David Bretos, Beatriz Mendez, David C. Maniaci, Johannes N. Theron, Alexander Meyer Forsting, Niels Nørmark Sørensen, Kisorthman Vimalakanthan, Marco Caboni, Ruben Gutierrez, Yana Gorbachova, Aya Aihara, and Francesco Grasso
Michele Sergio Campobasso, Alessio Castorrini, David Bretos, Beatriz Mendez, David C. Maniaci, Johannes N. Theron, Alexander Meyer Forsting, Niels Nørmark Sørensen, Kisorthman Vimalakanthan, Marco Caboni, Ruben Gutierrez, Yana Gorbachova, Aya Aihara, and Francesco Grasso
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 03 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
We assess against wind tunnel data the predictions of aerodynamics codes used in industry and research of wind turbine airfoil performance loss due to leading edge degradation. Predictions are close to measurements for moderate surface degradation. At severe degradation, differences among predictions increase due to user model and subjectivity in detailed set-up. Also quantified is the impact of airfoil performance variability on wind turbine energy losses, providing detailed sensitivity data.
Share
Altmetrics