Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-9
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-9
10 Feb 2026
 | 10 Feb 2026
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

Edgewise instabilities of a wind turbine blade section in attached flow conditions

Hendrik Verdonck and Oliver Hach

Abstract. With the persistent trend towards larger, lighter turbine blades and the resulting increase in blade flexibility, the risk of edgewise instabilities is elevated. This emphasizes the need for a better understanding of the accuracy of simulation models and the mechanisms affecting the damping of edgewise modes. This study investigates edgewise instabilities in wind turbines under attached flow conditions using a two-dimensional, three-degree-of-freedom typical section model. The primary goal of this work is to validate the stability analysis predictions from common low-fidelity aerodynamic models by comparing them with a high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) reference result. In addition, the study aims to deepen the understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind edgewise instabilities. The comparison of the stability analysis results obtained with aerodynamic models of different fidelity demonstrates excellent agreement in both the trends and quantitative damping predictions for the edgewise mode. An additional sensitivity study highlights the importance of the steady load vector on the damping prediction. The flutter mechanism analysis shows that the edgewise instabilities are caused by a coupling of flapwise motion with the structurally coupled edgewise-torsional motion. Edgewise instabilities can occur when there is sufficient structural edge-twist coupling, both in edge-twist coupling to stall or edge-twist coupling to feather. The findings in the paper increase the confidence in common low-fidelity aerodynamic models and contribute to a better understanding of edgewise instabilities.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Hendrik Verdonck and Oliver Hach

Status: open (extended)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Hendrik Verdonck and Oliver Hach
Hendrik Verdonck and Oliver Hach

Viewed

Total article views: 339 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
204 121 14 339 14 33
  • HTML: 204
  • PDF: 121
  • XML: 14
  • Total: 339
  • BibTeX: 14
  • EndNote: 33
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 330 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 330 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
The ongoing upscaling of wind turbines increases blade flexibility and the risk of aeroelastic instabilities, in which oscillations grow instead of being damped, potentially reducing lifetime or causing catastrophic failure. To mitigate this risk, engineers rely on simulation models and physical insight to assess design stability. This research evaluates the accuracy of such models and clarifies the underlying mechanisms, contributing to safe and more efficient future wind turbine designs.
Share
Altmetrics