the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Pathways to bring the costs down of floating offshore wind farms in the Atlantic Area
Abstract. Every nations' development lies on the electricity production, since it facilitates life and development of their society (heating, lighting, etc.). Nevertheless, conventional power plants, which use fossil fuels, cause environmental impacts, such as global warming, acidification, eutrophication, among many others. In addition, these conventional resources generate a dependence of external providers, which obstructs the progress of the developing countries. Renewable energies came to solve part of these problems. In this context, wind energy is one the technologies with more expansion all over the world. Offshore locations have a better wind resource than onshore ones and their exploitation is lower. The objective of this work is to present a holistic approach to assess the feasibility of a floating offshore wind farms in a life cycle perspective. The methodology proposed analyses the Net Present Value, the Internal Rate of Return, the Payback Period and the Levelized Cost of Energy of the farm. The case study is built based on a disruptive floating spar-type platform called TELWIND®, to be implemented in the Atlantic Area region. Results indicate how important these parameters are in economic terms and shows the pathways to reduce the costs of this type of infrastructures Furthermore, the methodology proposed allows the selection of the best region where a floating offshore wind farm can be installed. Finally, this study can be useful for Governments and relevant authorities to determine the best location of a floating offshore wind farm and develop the roadmap of offshore wind in their country.
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Withdrawal notice
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Preprint
(1284 KB)
Interactive discussion
-
SC1: 'Pathways to bring the costs down of floating offshore wind farms in the Atlantic Area', ANA GARCÍA, 05 Dec 2019
- AC2: 'Response to reviewer 1', Laura Castro-Santos, 05 Dec 2019
-
SC2: 'Comments: Recognized Values & Minor fixes', Carlos Alvarez, 05 Dec 2019
-
AC1: 'Response to reviewer 2', Laura Castro-Santos, 05 Dec 2019
-
SC3: 'On the proposal to improve figures', Carlos Alvarez, 09 Dec 2019
-
SC4: 'about improvements of the figures', Carlos Alvarez, 09 Dec 2019
-
AC3: 'COMMENTS TO REVIEWER', Laura Castro-Santos, 10 Dec 2019
-
SC5: 'about improvements of the figures NO. 8 & NO. 9', Carlos Alvarez, 10 Dec 2019
- AC4: 'Answer to reviewer', Laura Castro-Santos, 10 Jan 2020
-
SC5: 'about improvements of the figures NO. 8 & NO. 9', Carlos Alvarez, 10 Dec 2019
-
AC3: 'COMMENTS TO REVIEWER', Laura Castro-Santos, 10 Dec 2019
-
SC4: 'about improvements of the figures', Carlos Alvarez, 09 Dec 2019
-
SC3: 'On the proposal to improve figures', Carlos Alvarez, 09 Dec 2019
-
AC1: 'Response to reviewer 2', Laura Castro-Santos, 05 Dec 2019
-
RC1: 'Review comments (at least a major revision is needed)', Anonymous Referee #1, 23 Mar 2020
- AC5: 'REVIEW', Laura Castro-Santos, 23 Mar 2020
-
RC2: 'reviewer's comments', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Apr 2020
- AC6: 'REVIEW', Laura Castro-Santos, 10 Apr 2020
Interactive discussion
-
SC1: 'Pathways to bring the costs down of floating offshore wind farms in the Atlantic Area', ANA GARCÍA, 05 Dec 2019
- AC2: 'Response to reviewer 1', Laura Castro-Santos, 05 Dec 2019
-
SC2: 'Comments: Recognized Values & Minor fixes', Carlos Alvarez, 05 Dec 2019
-
AC1: 'Response to reviewer 2', Laura Castro-Santos, 05 Dec 2019
-
SC3: 'On the proposal to improve figures', Carlos Alvarez, 09 Dec 2019
-
SC4: 'about improvements of the figures', Carlos Alvarez, 09 Dec 2019
-
AC3: 'COMMENTS TO REVIEWER', Laura Castro-Santos, 10 Dec 2019
-
SC5: 'about improvements of the figures NO. 8 & NO. 9', Carlos Alvarez, 10 Dec 2019
- AC4: 'Answer to reviewer', Laura Castro-Santos, 10 Jan 2020
-
SC5: 'about improvements of the figures NO. 8 & NO. 9', Carlos Alvarez, 10 Dec 2019
-
AC3: 'COMMENTS TO REVIEWER', Laura Castro-Santos, 10 Dec 2019
-
SC4: 'about improvements of the figures', Carlos Alvarez, 09 Dec 2019
-
SC3: 'On the proposal to improve figures', Carlos Alvarez, 09 Dec 2019
-
AC1: 'Response to reviewer 2', Laura Castro-Santos, 05 Dec 2019
-
RC1: 'Review comments (at least a major revision is needed)', Anonymous Referee #1, 23 Mar 2020
- AC5: 'REVIEW', Laura Castro-Santos, 23 Mar 2020
-
RC2: 'reviewer's comments', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Apr 2020
- AC6: 'REVIEW', Laura Castro-Santos, 10 Apr 2020
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,020 | 297 | 81 | 1,398 | 98 | 99 |
- HTML: 1,020
- PDF: 297
- XML: 81
- Total: 1,398
- BibTeX: 98
- EndNote: 99
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1