Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-171
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-171
05 Oct 2025
 | 05 Oct 2025
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

Preference and Willingness-to-pay analysis for an eco-engineering technology for floating wind turbines

Antoine Dubois, Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu, Alison Bates, Jenifer Meredith, and Franck Schoefs

Abstract. As France accelerates its offshore wind energy ambitions to meet decarbonization targets, floating offshore wind turbines (FOWTs) have emerged as a key technology. However, concerns about their ecological and social impacts remain prominent among coastal populations. This study investigates public preferences and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for an innovative eco-engineering solution to be integrated into future floating wind farms: a multifunctional structure aiming at enhancing marine biodiversity, supporting artisanal fisheries and minimizing seabed disturbance. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted on 306 French residents across five coastal departments to quantify trade-offs and explore territorial variation in acceptability.

The DCE included four attributes: structure material (recycled or new steel), biodiversity gain, impact on local fisheries revenue, and additional cost to electricity bills. Results from a Conditional Logit Model and WTP estimation reveal a generally high level of support for eco-engineering features with biodiversity and fishery co-benefits strongly valued. Only the “recycled steel” attribute showed significant territorial variation, with Bouches-du-Rhône respondents exhibiting a higher WTP for this attribute.

The study also showed that negative attitudes toward offshore wind power were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of selecting the status quo scenario, even when ecological enhancements were present. The study underscores the importance of integrating social preferences into the early design of FOWT projects and demonstrates that eco-engineering can be a viable lever for environmental and social integration of these projects.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Antoine Dubois, Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu, Alison Bates, Jenifer Meredith, and Franck Schoefs

Status: open (until 02 Nov 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Antoine Dubois, Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu, Alison Bates, Jenifer Meredith, and Franck Schoefs
Antoine Dubois, Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu, Alison Bates, Jenifer Meredith, and Franck Schoefs

Viewed

Total article views: 65 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
53 9 3 65 1 1
  • HTML: 53
  • PDF: 9
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 65
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Oct 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Oct 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 65 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 65 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 09 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
We studied how French coastal residents view floating offshore wind farms when ecological improvements are added. We found strong support for designs that boost marine life and help small-scale fisheries, even at a higher electricity cost. Views differed slightly by region, especially regarding recycled materials. Our results show that including social and environmental concerns early can improve acceptance of these projects.
Share
Altmetrics