the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geometric Nonlinear Analysis of Timoshenko Beams with Variable Cross-Section Using Co-rotational Formulation
Abstract. The geometrically nonlinear analysis of Timoshenko beam structures with variable cross-sections is a common challenge in engineering practice. However, traditional nonlinear analysis methods for such structures often suffer from limited accuracy and computational inefficiency. To address these challenges, this study proposes an efficient geometrically nonlinear analysis framework for variable cross-section Timoshenko beams based on the co-rotational formulation. First, the novel Timoshenko beam element with a variable cross-section, based on analytical displacement shape functions, is developed to enhance the computational accuracy of the co-rotational formulation. The Gaussian integration method is employed to compute the stiffness and mass matrices of variable cross-section elements, thereby improving computational efficiency. Then, the tangent stiffness matrix of the variable cross-section beam element is derived based on co-rotational formulation and the proposed variable cross-section beam element. Finally, the dedicated finite element program is developed and validated through four benchmark examples and comparisons with experimental data from the literature. The results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves both high computational efficiency and accuracy in handling large deformations and nonlinear behavior. The proposed method is particularly suitable for analyzing structures with irregular or proportionally graded cross-sections and demonstrates advantages over existing co-rotational approaches.
- Preprint
(1090 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 31 Jan 2026)
-
RC1: 'Comment on wes-2025-180', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Nov 2025
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Yanpei Gao, 17 Nov 2025
reply
We appreciate the positive comment from this Anonymous Referee #1 in the interactive discussion, and will consider the anisotropy aspect in the future.
Thank you again for taking your time to thoroughly review our manuscript and make comments.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-180-AC1 -
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 17 Nov 2025
reply
Thank you for the repsonse! I am fine with the content of the manuscript. Good work!
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-180-RC2
-
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 17 Nov 2025
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Yanpei Gao, 17 Nov 2025
reply
-
RC3: 'Comment on wes-2025-180', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Jan 2026
reply
Thank you for the opportunity to review the manuscript wes-2025-180 entitled "Geometric Nonlinear Analysis of Timoshenko Beams with Variable Cross-Section Using Co-rotational Formulation" for the Journal of Wind Energy Science.
Having thoroughly reviewed the manuscript, I find that the study is well-conducted and presents valuable insights in its field. Overall, the research is of good quality; however, there are certain points and details in the analysis and presentation that would benefit from further clarification and revisions to enhance the clarity and impact of the work.
I appreciate the opportunity to contribute to the review process and support the maintenance of high-quality standards in the Journal of Wind Energy Science.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-180-RC3 -
RC4: 'Reply on RC3', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Jan 2026
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://wes.copernicus.org/preprints/wes-2025-180/wes-2025-180-RC4-supplement.pdf
-
RC5: 'Reply on RC3', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Jan 2026
reply
Review Report
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC5', Yanpei Gao, 23 Jan 2026
reply
Thank you very much for your valuable suggestions. Your comments have been immensely helpful in improving our paper. Please find our point-by-point responses to your feedback in the attached document.
-
AC4: 'Reply on AC2', Yanpei Gao, 23 Jan 2026
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://wes.copernicus.org/preprints/wes-2025-180/wes-2025-180-AC4-supplement.pdf
-
AC4: 'Reply on AC2', Yanpei Gao, 23 Jan 2026
reply
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC5', Yanpei Gao, 23 Jan 2026
reply
-
RC4: 'Reply on RC3', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Jan 2026
reply
-
RC6: 'Comment on wes-2025-180', Anonymous Referee #3, 17 Jan 2026
reply
The authors formulate a co-rotational Timoshenko beam element for large displacement analysis of 3D frames, considering the influence of variable cross-section. The solution of the equilibrium equations is used to interpolate the lateral displacements and rotations for improving the element efficiency. Numerical examples and experiments are carried out to confirm the accuracy of the element. The topic is of interest, but many issues should be clarified for further evaluation of the paper.
- Primarily, the solution of the equilibrium equations of a Timoshenko beam with variable cross-section is difficult to derive. The author should provide more details on the derivation of the solution and the considered section profile. I believe that a solution for a general section cannot be derived. Additionally, the number of Gauss points used to evaluate the element tangent stiffness and mass matrices depends on the profile of the beam section. It is difficult to evaluate the element without knowing this information.
- The authors claim that “the proposed method achieves both high computational efficiency and accuracy in handling large deformations and nonlinear behavior”, but the efficiency is not demonstrated in the paper.
- The presentation should be improved. Section 3 presents the co-rotational framework, which is well-known in the literature, but no references are cited. A 3D beam is considered, but the equilibrium equation (1) is written for a 2D beam. An explanation for Eqs. (1)-(3) should be given.
- More information on the large deformation behavior of the structure, such as snap-through and snap-back, is required to show the efficiency of the element and numerical algorithm.
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC6', Yanpei Gao, 23 Jan 2026
reply
Thank you for your review and feedback. Your valuable suggestions are essential for the refinement of our manuscript. Please find our point-by-point responses to your comments in the attached document.
-
AC5: 'Reply on AC3', Yanpei Gao, 23 Jan 2026
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://wes.copernicus.org/preprints/wes-2025-180/wes-2025-180-AC5-supplement.pdf
-
AC5: 'Reply on AC3', Yanpei Gao, 23 Jan 2026
reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 351 | 117 | 33 | 501 | 22 | 22 |
- HTML: 351
- PDF: 117
- XML: 33
- Total: 501
- BibTeX: 22
- EndNote: 22
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Thank you for the opportunity to review the Manuscript wes-2025-180 entitled "Geometric Nonlinear Analysis of Timoshenko Beams with Variable Cross-Section Using Co-rotational Formulation" for the Journal of Wind Energy Science.
To the best of my knowledge, I have thoroughly reviewed the manuscript, and I would recommend in accept the manuscript based on my review.
Thanks again for providing the opportunity to contribute the review support to maintain the quality standard of Wind Energy Science Journal.
I look forward to contributing more review support, so please share any additional manuscripts within my area of expertise. Thank you!