Translational Dynamics of Bridled Kites: A Reduced-Order Model in the Course Reference Frame
Abstract. The design and control of airborne wind energy systems requires fast, validated reduced-order models. Because aerodynamic identification of soft, bridled kites is challenging, models that minimise the number of parameters to be identified can be particularly valuable. This paper presents a reduced-order model for the translational dynamics of bridled kites, consisting of a wing supported by multiple bridle lines. The kite is modelled as a point mass in a spherical reference frame aligned with the instantaneous tangential flight direction, referred to as the course reference frame. The angle of attack follows geometrically from a constant angle between the wing chord and the bridle line system, under the assumption that the wing instantaneously aligns with the pull direction, i.e., the rotational dynamics are neglected. The formulation retains gravitational and inertial terms introduced by the curvilinear reference frame and applies a quasi-steady condition of zero path-aligned acceleration, modelling the motion as a sequence of quasi-steady (trimmed) states that relate the trim speed and angle of attack. Model validation is based on public flight datasets from two different soft-wing kites and on dynamic simulations that cover higher wing loadings. Results show that for low wing loadings typical of soft kites, the quasi-steady approximation reproduces the dynamic trajectories with less than 1 % deviation in mean reel-out power. For higher loadings and hard-wing kites, inertia introduces substantial phase lag and amplitude damping, causing power deviations of up to 14 %. Overall, the proposed model provides a computationally efficient framework for analysing the translational dynamics of bridled kites. The formulation is well-suited to trajectory optimisation, parametric studies, and control design in airborne wind energy systems.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Wind Energy Science. R.S. is a co-founder of and advisor for the start-up company Kitepower B.V., which is commercially developing a 100 kW kite power system and provided their test data used in this paper for validation. Both authors were financially supported by the European Union’s MERIDIONAL project, which also provided funding for Kitepower B.V..
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Relevant problem setting, good method and strong results.
Minor comments:
* When theta_b is introduced on line 94, the formula is not yet clear, that only comes on line 104. I recommend making a forward reference to Equation (2) and adding theta_b in Figure 2.
* All values in Equation (3) should be defined below it.
* On line 174, "equations of obtained" should be "equations obtained"
* The radial velocity is also set to zero "for practical implementation" on line 296. I understand that this is not used as equilibrium condition, but it is strange to mention this so late in the process, after emphasizing that only the tangential acceleration is set to zero.
* On line 383, the gaps in the curves of Figure 8 are explained, but this could be explained in more detail. What is observed if the model is applied to these situations?
* Missing text on line 487.