Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-243
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-243
19 Nov 2025
 | 19 Nov 2025
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

Wake steering under inflow wind direction uncertainty: an LES study

Emily Louise Hodgson and Søren Juhl Andersen

Abstract. Wake steering through static yaw control is a promising wind farm flow control strategy, however full scale implementation in real wind farms is hampered by uncertainties not typically present in a simulation environment. The most notable of these are bias and variability in inflow wind direction - which are both inherent in the atmosphere and introduced through imperfect measurements. To investigate the impact of these uncertainties, LES is conducted on a row of four turbines in a conventionally neutral boundary layer, using three yaw configurations (an unyawed baseline, the leading turbine yawed and the first three turbines yawed) under different inflow wind directions ∈ [5, 8]°. The impact of the applied yaw strategy and mean wind direction offset is first studied, considering the asymmetry introduced by veer, mean wake shape, changes in local inflow angle and individual turbine power and loads. Considering mean wind farm power output, the inflow wind direction standard deviation in the current study (σWD = 2.3°) results in a beneficial window for wake steering of 8.5° (∈ [1.5, 7.0]°) with peak total power gains of 23 % and 7.5 % for the two yaw strategies, respectively. Extrapolating to an uncertainty of σWD = 4.5° using a Gaussian convolution reduces the beneficial ranges to 8° and 6.5° respectively, with peak gains of 7.5 % and 2 %. While exact numbers depend on turbine spacing, the substantial decrease in peak power and narrow range of power gains signify that wake steering is highly sensitive to wind direction uncertainty and small biases in mean inflow wind direction. Therefore, accurate measurement of these quantities and inclusion of them in prediction models is essential.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Emily Louise Hodgson and Søren Juhl Andersen

Status: open (until 17 Dec 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Emily Louise Hodgson and Søren Juhl Andersen
Emily Louise Hodgson and Søren Juhl Andersen
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 19 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
This work investigates the impact of wind direction uncertainty on wake steering, a promising flow control strategy that aims to increase the efficiency of wind farms, using high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics. It concludes that wake steering is sensitive to both bias and uncertainty in inflow wind direction due to having a relatively small range over which gains are predicted and showing significant decreases in peak power output with increasing wind direction uncertainty.
Share
Altmetrics