Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-182
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-182
13 Oct 2026
 | 13 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

A comparison of efficient AEP models for Wind Farm Layout Optimization

Javier Andueza-Bueno, Leonardo Alcayaga, Mikkel Friis-Møller, and Pierre-Elouan Réthoré

Abstract. As wind farms scale up to benefit from cost reductions, wake effects create significant challenges, increasing the importance of the Wind Farm Layout Optimization (WFLO) problem. Current methods to maximize Annual Energy Production (AEP) by minimizing wake losses are computationally intensive, requiring hundreds of iterations and multiple optimizations per project. In this work we present the results of testing several AEP models with a variety of simplifications, assumptions and approaches as the objective function in gradient based optimizations, comparing them against a reference. These include the conventional rectangular quadrature in different forms and the novel approaches FLOWERS and Bayesian Quadrature, alongside the Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) optimization algorithm. Four different wind farms encompassing different boundaries, wind roses, sizes and types of constraints were used. Three different wake models are considered here, introducing the FLOWERS derivation for Nygaard TurbOPark. The results showed that FLOWERS achieved the greatest balance between efficiency (optimization time) and efficacy (quality of the layout found), with time reductions of over 95 % and layouts comparable to the reference, although it encountered difficulties with strongly unimodal wind roses. Similar layouts were found using rectangular quadrature with a coarse wind direction binning; however, this method was not as efficient as FLOWERS, and worked well only in combination with the Gaussian Bastankhah wake model, with optimization time reductions between 40 and 70 %. Nevertheless, it proved to be more versatile, even for strongly unimodal wind roses. The work also highlights the struggles for probabilistic methods to properly capture the physics and turbine interactions in the problem, not properly reflecting the positive or negative effects of modifying the layout despite their ability to estimate AEP accurately. The similarity in results between using the local wind speed or the free flow wind speed to compute the thrust coefficient in a WFLO framework is pointed out. Finally, SGD was found to obtain consistent layouts, albeit with the highest computational cost out of all methods.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Javier Andueza-Bueno, Leonardo Alcayaga, Mikkel Friis-Møller, and Pierre-Elouan Réthoré

Status: open (until 10 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Javier Andueza-Bueno, Leonardo Alcayaga, Mikkel Friis-Møller, and Pierre-Elouan Réthoré
Javier Andueza-Bueno, Leonardo Alcayaga, Mikkel Friis-Møller, and Pierre-Elouan Réthoré

Viewed

Total article views: 78 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
61 14 3 78 3 3
  • HTML: 61
  • PDF: 14
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 78
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Oct 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Oct 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 78 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 78 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 14 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
In a wind farm, each turbine slows down the wind behind it, so turbines downstream produce less energy. Therefore, their positions affect the farm's output, and algorithms are used to find the best layout. These algorithms estimate yearly energy output many times, which can make the process slow. This study compares faster ways of making this estimate and shows that the most useful methods are not necessarily the most accurate ones, but those that best capture how turbines affect each other.
Share
Altmetrics