the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Controlling rigid-wing airborne wind energy systems during circular flight without exact path following
Abstract. We propose a simple feedback architecture that enables effective flight control of rigid-wing airborne wind energy systems during circular-pattern reel out. The controller performs well with only proportional-integral regulators, thereby presenting a significantly simpler solution compared to the existing literature. The key idea is in tracking the roll angle on a non-static reference frame, effectively reducing the control problem to one degree of freedom. This method of navigation does not require users to define an exact path for the kite to follow, which contributes to stability and robustness. In its minimum viable form, the controller can function with only ailerons while requiring no pitot-tube measurement, although the addition of elevators and rudder enables angle-of-attack and zero-sideslip tracking for more efficient power generation. Simulation-based verification is conducted on an industrial, 6-degree-of-freedom model with a flexible tether, nonlinear aerodynamics, and realistic wind conditions, showing satisfactory performance in all cases. Three expansions to the control law are then presented. The first one reduces angle of attack fluctuation during reel-out by adding a proportional pitch angle feedback term to the elevator, resulting in more power. In the second expansion, the reel-out radius is automatically adjusted to enable phase synchronisation of multiple kites in a farm configuration, where minimum separation rules may apply. The third expansion implements a simple proportional feedback rule that enables figure-of-eight flight. By using simple proportional-integral architecture, the controller is easy to implement, making it a suitable baseline system for benchmarking more advanced control laws.
- Preprint
(8893 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
- RC1: 'Comment on wes-2026-69', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 May 2026
- RC2: 'Comment on wes-2026-69', Anonymous Referee #2, 26 May 2026
- AC1: 'Comment on wes-2026-69', Duc Nguyen, 01 Jul 2026
-
EC1: 'Comment on wes-2026-69', Roland Schmehl, 15 Jul 2026
Dear authors,
In your reply to reviewer #1, you write, "We refer to this code at the end of the abstract and in the final paragraph of section 3.2." Firstly, I would not add a specific section or appendix from within the abstract of the paper. Mentioning the availability of the code in Section 3.2 and in the "Code and data availability" is sufficient.
Secondly, it is no longer customary to print an entire source code directly in a scientific journal. Today, the standard practice is to host the code in a public repository and provide a link to it in your paper. Even better would be to also deposit a release of the source code to, e.g. Zenodo, and include this deposit with a DOI.Â
Best regards,
Roland SchmehlCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-69-EC1 -
EC2: 'Reply on EC1', Roland Schmehl, 15 Jul 2026
Apologies for the typo: it should read "Firstly, I would not refer to a specific section...". I can not edit my comment, it seems.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-69-EC2
-
EC2: 'Reply on EC1', Roland Schmehl, 15 Jul 2026
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 321 | 102 | 26 | 449 | 19 | 22 |
- HTML: 321
- PDF: 102
- XML: 26
- Total: 449
- BibTeX: 19
- EndNote: 22
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Feedback to the author
Overall, this is a strong and technically well-developed paper, and I enjoyed reviewing it. The controller design is simple yet effective, and the idea of achieving stable circular reel-out without requiring the kite to follow an exact predefined path is both original and practically valuable. The use of the high-fidelity KM1 simulation model, including flexible tether dynamics, nonlinear aerodynamics, and realistic turbulence conditions, also increases confidence in the presented results.
It also appears that this may be the first published implementation of figure-of-eight (F8) flight using the KM1 simulation model within this line of research, which further adds to the novelty of the work.
The paper would be strengthened by including additional robustness studies, such as the effects of sensor noise, time delays, actuator saturation, wind-direction changes, different turbulence realizations, and lower airspeed conditions.
The authors mention that the controller gains were tuned empirically and follow time-scale separation principles. However, the actual gain values are mostly embedded within the block diagrams. A dedicated table summarizing all controller gains would improve clarity, reproducibility, and ease of implementation for future researchers.
It would also be helpful to provide additional implementation details, including:
The paper applies a largely unified cascaded control architecture, where most operating conditions are handled through changes in set points, outer-loop logic, or small controller extensions rather than switching between fundamentally different controllers. While this simplicity is one of the strengths of the work, it may also be beneficial to discuss whether different flight phases of the AWES operation (such as launch, reel-out, reel-in, transition, and landing) would eventually require phase-dependent cascaded control strategies beyond the current inner- and outer-loop structure.
Finally, there appears to be a typo in the equation reference on page 6, where the text should refer to Eq. (12).
Â