Articles | Volume 1, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-1-55-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-1-55-2016
Research article
 | 
20 May 2016
Research article |  | 20 May 2016

Comparison of OpenFOAM and EllipSys3D for neutral atmospheric flow over complex terrain

Dalibor Cavar, Pierre-Elouan Réthoré, Andreas Bechmann, Niels N. Sørensen, Benjamin Martinez, Frederik Zahle, Jacob Berg, and Mark C. Kelly

Viewed

Total article views: 3,704 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,554 1,980 170 3,704 146 164
  • HTML: 1,554
  • PDF: 1,980
  • XML: 170
  • Total: 3,704
  • BibTeX: 146
  • EndNote: 164
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Mar 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Mar 2016)

Cited

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
Feasibility of a freely available CFD tool, OpenFOAM, in calculating flows of general relevance to the wind industry is investigated by comparing several aspects of its performance to a well-established in-house EllipSys3D solver. The comparison is focused on CFD solver demands regarding grid generation process and computational time. The quality and accuracy of the achieved results are investigated by conducting the computations using identical/similar solver parameters and numerical setups..
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint