Articles | Volume 10, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-83-2025
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-83-2025
Research article
 | 
09 Jan 2025
Research article |  | 09 Jan 2025

On the lidar-turbulence paradox and possible countermeasures

Alfredo Peña, Ginka G. Yankova, and Vasiliki Mallini

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on wes-2024-108', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Sep 2024
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alfredo Peña, 07 Nov 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on wes-2024-108', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 Oct 2024
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Alfredo Peña, 07 Nov 2024

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Alfredo Peña on behalf of the Authors (07 Nov 2024)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (11 Nov 2024) by Etienne Cheynet
ED: Publish as is (13 Nov 2024) by Etienne Cheynet
ED: Publish as is (13 Nov 2024) by Julia Gottschall (Chief editor)
AR by Alfredo Peña on behalf of the Authors (15 Nov 2024)
Download
Short summary
Lidars are vastly used in wind energy, but most users struggle when interpreting lidar turbulence measures. Here, we explain the difficulty in converting them into standard measurements. We show two ways of converting lidar to in situ turbulence measurements, both using neural networks: one of them is based on physics, while the other is purely data-driven. They show promising results when compared to high-quality turbulence measurements from a tall mast.
Special issue
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint